Table 5.
Distribution patterns of M. tuberculosis drug polyresistant strains isolated from HIV positive and Negative TB patients in Western Kenya
| County | Polyresistant drug combination among HIV positive TB patients | Polyresistant drug combination among HIV negative TB patients | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INH + GFX | INH + AMK | INH + ETH | INH + KAN | Total | RIF + AMK | INH + GFX | INH + KAN | ETH + ETH | ETH + STY | Total | |
| Nyamira | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (1.4%) |
| Bungoma | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 2 (0.7%) |
| Busia | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.3%) | 3 (1.0%) |
| Homabay | 1 (0.4%) | 2 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (1.1%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.3%) | 5 (1.7%) |
| Kakamega | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) |
| Kisumu | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (1.0%) |
| Migori | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0) |
| Kisii | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) |
| Vihiga | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) |
| Siaya | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) |
| Total | 2 (0.7%) | 3 (1.1%) | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.4%) | 10 (3.7%) | 2 (0.7%) | 1 (0.3%) | 2 (0.7%) | 3 (1.0%) | 3 (1.0%) | 21 (7.3%) |
The bold was just used to track entries