Table 3.
Case 1: exome testing in work-up of a child with neurocognitive and/or developmental problems | |
Appropriate candidates for testing | What clinical or laboratory evaluation should be undertaken prior to testing? What is the optimal age for testing? |
Trio evaluation | What clinical presentations are best evaluated with trio testing? |
Secondary findings | What are the pros and cons of seeking specified secondary findings? |
Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and pathogenic or likely pathogenic findings unrelated to clinical presentation | What pretest counseling is recommended related to the possibility of VUS and findings unrelated to clinical presentation? What laboratory and clinical follow-up is recommended for each? |
Case 2: patient with a strong family history of breast cancer | |
Scope of gene panel | What are the relative benefits and harms of more inclusive vs. less inclusive panels? |
Implications of patient characteristics | Should panels differ for patients with cancer vs. those being tested for a positive family history? How should family history or other patient characteristics influence the scope of the panel? |
Moderate risk variants | What are the pros and cons of including genes associated with moderate risk? |
Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and pathogenic or likely pathogenic findings unrelated to clinical presentation | What pretest counseling is recommended on the possibility of VUS and findings unrelated to clinical presentation? What laboratory and clinical follow-up is recommended on each? |
Clinical follow-up | What interventions should be informed by test results? |