Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 13;63(12):3982–3990. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00202

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons for in-person versus video chat samples at Timepoint 1.

Variable In-person (n =16)
Video chat (n = 46)
z r p
M (SD) Range M (SD) Range
Age (months) 24.00 (4.02) 19–32 24.87 (4.24) 18–34 −0.81 .10 .42
Income:Needs ratio 4.65 (4.10) 0.61–14.69 5.66 (4.31) 0.69–19.59 −1.20 .15 .23
% utterances audio signal intelligible 99.07% (1.36%) 95.00%–100% 98.44% (3.29%) 81.75%–100% −0.07 .01 .95
% utterances child speech intelligible 86.31% (9.03%) 68.00%–100% 84.91% (10.08%) 60.00%–100% −0.36 .05 .72
Type–token ratio 0.48 (0.09) 0.34–0.62 0.46 (0.09) 0.25–0.69 −1.05 .13 .30
Mean length of utterance 1.69 (0.58) 1.02–2.60 1.75 (0.68) 1.02–3.58 −0.19 .02 .85
Number of different words 37.13 (11.90) 13–68 37.59 (12.63) 20–64 −0.13 .02 .90
Errors 1.06 (1.34) 0–4 1.11 (1.64) 0–7 −0.17 .02 .87
Omissions 3.63 (4.66) 0–18 3.83 (3.95) 0–19 −0.62 .08 .54

Note. All z values are from Mann–Whitney U tests. Effect size measured in units of r.