Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Metab. 2021 Nov 18;3(11):1500–1511. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00486-5

Figure 5. Physiological folates prevent growth of MTR knockout tumors and cause methotrexate resistance.

Figure 5.

(A) Tumor weight of subcutaneous xenografts generated by injection of 100,000 A549 MTR knockout cells without (+EV) or with (+MTR) MTR expression into the flanks of NSG mice. Tumors were harvested after 4 months (n=3 mice per condition; n.d.: not detected). (B-C) Plasma concentration of folic acid (B) and 5-methyl THF (C) in NSG mice provided with unlimited water (control water) or water containing 0.1 g/L folic acid (+folic acid water) for 3 weeks (n=10 mice per condition; folic acid p = 0.1; 5-methyl THF p = 0.053). (D) Tumor weight of subcutaneous xenografts formed by injecting 1,000,000 A549 MTR knockout cells +EV or +MTR into the flanks of NSG mice provided with control or folic acid water as in B-C since the day of injection. Tumors were harvested after 3 months (n=5 mice per condition; +MTR control vs. folic acid water p = 0.1, +EV vs +MTR folic acid water p = 0.5; n.d.: not detected). (E) Proliferation rates of A549 MTR knockout cells +EV or +MTR cultured in folic acid (+FA) or 5-methyl THF (5-MeTHF) for 4 days across a range of methotrexate doses (n = 3 independent samples). (F) Overall population log2 fold change in relative viability of 489 cell lines cultured in 5-methyl THF versus folic acid as in E at the indicated methotrexate doses. Median (box center line), interquartile range (IQR) (box), and 1.5*IQR (whiskers) are plotted (n = 489 cell lines). (G) Overall pooled 489 cell line population bulk proliferation rate in doublings per day (left panel, n = 4 measurements of 1 pooled sample; overall folic acid vs. 5-methyl THF dose-response p-value = 0.013, pairwise comparison adjusted p-values: 0 nM p = 1, 7.8 nM p = 0.233, 31.3 nM p = 0.001, 1000 nM p = 0.28) and averaged proliferation rates across all cell lines (right panel, n = 489 cell lines; overall folic acid vs. 5-methyl THF dose-response p-value = 3.5*10−5, pairwise comparison adjusted p-values: 0 nM p = 0.85, 7.8 nM p = 5.2*10−5, 31.3 nM p ~ 0, 1000 nM p ~ 0) cultured in 5-methyl THF or folic acid as in E at the indicated methotrexate doses. Tukey HSD and pairwise comparison p-values at each dose were calculated by correcting a two-way ANOVA test for multiple comparisons between the dose response curves in the two folate sources. (H) LC/MS measurement of intracellular folate, 5-methyl THF, combined 5,10-methenyl THF/10-formyl THF, THF, and DHF levels in A549 MTR knockout cells +EV or +MTR cultured in the indicated folate as in E across a range of methotrexate doses (n = 3 independent samples). Data are normalized to protein concentration and an internal standard. (I) Proliferation rates of A549 MTR knockout cells +MTR cultured in the indicated folate as in E with or without the addition of 100 μM each of the indicated nucleotide precursors hypoxanthine (H), uridine (U), and thymidine (T), as well as methotrexate or vehicle (DMSO) (n = 3 independent samples except n=6 for samples +FA − vehicle, − 4 uM, and +H,U,T +4 uM and +5-MeTHF − vehicle). For the +H and +U,T conditions, only the lower dose (500 nM) of methotrexate was assessed. (A-I) Mean +/− SD error bars are displayed. p-values are derived from a two-tailed, unpaired Welch’s t test except as otherwise indicated in G (* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001).