Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;84(3):541–567. doi: 10.1007/s10734-021-00787-4

Table 1.

Descriptive overview of four experimental groups (n = 2,490)

Group 1 (close & like-minded victim) Group 2 (close & differently minded victim) Group 3 (not close & like-minded victim Group 4 (not close & differently minded victim
Wording Think about a situation in which your close colleague gives a public interview. You completely agree with the views given in the interview. After the interview he/she will get a death threat personally on social media Think about a situation in which your close colleague gives a public interview. You completely disagree with the views given in the interview. After the interview he/she will get a death threat personally on social media Think about a situation in which an unknown person from your field gives a public interview. You completely agree with the views given in the interview. After the interview he/she will get a death threat personally on social media Think about a situation in which an unknown person from your field gives a public interview. You completely disagree with the views given in the interview. After the interview he/she will get a death threat personally on social media
n 593 664 612 621
M (SD) anxiety 30.97 (7.57) 31.53 (7.31) 28.64 (7.65) 28.88 (7.12)
M (SD) suggested countermeasures 2.33 (1.12) 2.42 (1.21) 2.20 (1.03) 2.23 (1.10)