Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;21:294. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01510-7

Table 1.

Characteristics of previous surveys

Authors Journal Publication year Survey questions Number of anaesthesiologists responding Total number of anaesthesiologists Response rate Key results
Myles PS, et al. [22] Anaesthesia 2003 22 186 220 85.0% Many anaesthetists have had a patient who exhibited awareness under anaesthesia, but most rated awareness as only a moderate problem.
Lau K, et al. [21] Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006 26 2170 4927 44.0% Most anaesthetists accept that clinical signs are unreliable indicators of awareness; few believe that DoA monitors should be used for routine cases in the UK.
Ben-Menachem E, et al. [8] Anesth Analg 2014 23 289 963 30.0% The primary driver for the use of DoA monitoring in Australia is prevention of awareness.
Cheung YM, et al. [23] BMC Anaesthesiol 2018 24 168 553 30.0% Prevention of awareness is the most important reason to use DoA monitoring in children. The perceived lack of reliability of DoA monitoring in children is the most important reason not to use it.