Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;29(4):2231–2239. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11088-6

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics compared between pre-COVID and during-COVID time periods

Pre-COVID
(N = 376)
During-COVID
(N = 197)
Total
(N = 573)
p value
Age (at visit) 0.5491
Mean (SD) 60.5 (13.5) 59.8 (13.6) 60.3 (13.5)
Median 61.5 60.0 61.0
Q1, Q3 52.0, 69.5 50.0, 70.0 51.0, 70.0
Range (18.0-99.0) (26.0-87.0) (18.0-99.0)
Gender 0.5552
F 373 (99.2%) 197 (100.0%) 570 (99.5%)
M 3 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (0.5%)
Race 0.0302
White 351 (93.4%) 183 (92.9%) 534 (93.2%)
Black or African American 7 (1.9%) 1 (0.5%) 8 (1.4%)
Asian 6 (1.6%) 7 (3.6%) 13 (2.3%)
American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 (0.0%) 3 (1.5%) 3 (0.5%)
Unknown or not reported 12 (3.2%) 3 (1.5%) 15 (2.6%)
Ethnicity 0.8353
Not Hispanic or Latino 360 (95.7%) 187 (94.9%) 547 (95.5%)
Hispanic or Latino 10 (2.7%) 7 (3.6%) 17 (3.0%)
Unknown or not reported 6 (1.6%) 3 (1.5%) 9 (1.6%)
Distance from facility (miles) 0.0051
N 368 197 565
Mean (SD) 215.3 (320.0) 152.7 (207.5) 193.5 (287.2)
Median 86.7 67.3 77.4
Q1, Q3 45.8, 261.7 20.9, 197.8 35.3, 248.6
Range (1.9-2530.1) (1.9-1225.4) (1.9-2530.1)
Distance within 100 miles 0.0193
Missing 8 0 8
≥100 miles 178 (48.4%) 75 (38.1%) 253 (44.8%)
<100 miles 190 (51.6%) 122 (61.9%) 312 (55.2%)
Did patient live in-state? 0.0943
Missing 8 0 8
No 167 (45.4%) 75 (38.1%) 242 (42.8%)
Yes 201 (54.6%) 122 (61.9%) 323 (57.2%)
Did patient live in MN or surrounding 4 states? 0.0763
Missing 8 0 8
No 83 (22.6%) 32 (16.2%) 115 (20.4%)
Yes 285 (77.4%) 165 (83.8%) 450 (79.6%)
Insurance type 0.2713
Missing 3 1 4
Employee 29 (7.8%) 21 (10.7%) 50 (8.8%)
Govt 123 (33.0%) 54 (27.6%) 177 (31.1%)
Private 221 (59.2%) 121 (61.7%) 342 (60.1%)
Method of detection 0.4723
Missing 11 4 15
Imaging detected 240 (65.8%) 121 (62.7%) 361 (64.7%)
Palpable abnormality/symptoms 125 (34.2%) 72 (37.3%) 197 (35.3%)
Bilateral cancer 0.3393
No 363 (96.5%) 193 (98.0%) 556 (97.0%)
Yes 13 (3.5%) 4 (2.0%) 17 (3.0%)
Clinical T category 0.0874
cTis 68 (18.1%) 29 (14.7%) 97 (16.9%)
cT1 182 (48.4%) 92 (46.7%) 274 (47.8%)
cT2 88 (23.4%) 48 (24.4%) 136 (23.7%)
cT3 28 (7.4%) 19 (9.6%) 47 (8.2%)
cT4 10 (2.7%) 9 (4.6%) 19 (3.3%)
Clinical N category 0.3124
cN0 305 (81.1%) 152 (77.2%) 457 (79.8%)
cN1 53 (14.1%) 34 (17.3%) 87 (15.2%)
cN2 7 (1.9%) 3 (1.5%) 10 (1.7%)
cN3 11 (2.9%) 8 (4.1%) 19 (3.3%)
Clinical node-positive 0.2633
No 305 (81.1%) 152 (77.2%) 457 (79.8%)
Yes 71 (18.9%) 45 (22.8%) 116 (20.2%)
Clinical M category >0.992
cM0 367 (97.6%) 193 (98.0%) 560 (97.7%)
cM1 9 (2.4%) 4 (2.0%) 13 (2.3%)
AJCC 7th edition clinical anatomic stage 0.1234
0 68 (18.1%) 28 (14.2%) 96 (16.8%)
I 170 (45.2%) 86 (43.7%) 256 (44.7%)
II 99 (26.3%) 55 (27.9%) 154 (26.9%)
III 30 (8.0%) 24 (12.2%) 54 (9.4%)
IV 9 (2.4%) 4 (2.0%) 13 (2.3%)
AJCC 8th edition clinical prognostic stage 0.2334
0 68 (18.1%) 28 (14.2%) 96 (16.8%)
I 211 (56.1%) 112 (56.9%) 323 (56.4%)
II 65 (17.3%) 35 (17.8%) 100 (17.5%)
III 23 (6.1%) 18 (9.1%) 41 (7.2%)
IV 9 (2.4%) 4 (2.0%) 13 (2.3%)
Grade 0.9184
Missing 2 1 3
I 110 (29.4%) 54 (27.6%) 164 (28.8%)
II 161 (43.0%) 93 (47.4%) 254 (44.6%)
III 103 (27.5%) 49 (25.0%) 152 (26.7%)
ER status 0.3823
Missing 1 0 1
Negative 49 (13.1%) 31 (15.7%) 80 (14.0%)
Positive 326 (86.9%) 166 (84.3%) 492 (86.0%)
PR status 0.6503
Missing 4 0 4
Negative 77 (20.7%) 44 (22.3%) 121 (21.3%)
Positive 295 (79.3%) 153 (77.7%) 448 (78.7%)
HER2 status (among patients with invasive breast cancer) 0.8963
Missing 2 3 5
Negative 266 (86.9%) 145 (87.3%) 411 (87.1%)
Positive 40 (13.1%) 21 (13.7%) 61 (12.9%)
Biologic subtype (among patients with invasive breast cancer) 0.9993
Missing 3 3 6
HR+/HER2+ 30 (9.8%) 16 (9.6%) 46 (9.8%)
HR+/HER2- 234 (76.7%) 127 (76.5%) 361 (76.6%)
HR-/HER2+ 9 (3.0%) 5 (3.0%) 14 (3.0%)
HR-/HER2- 32 (10.5%) 18 (10.8%) 50 (10.6%)

1Wilcoxon

2Fisher Exact

3Chi-Square

4Armitage Trend Test