Table 3.
Study | Regimen | Line of Therapy | Pts (n) | Response Rate | Duration of Response | Notes/Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Migden MR et al. 2018 [50] | Cemiplimab | First Line (31%) Second+ Line (69%) |
26 | CR 0% PR 50% ORR 50% |
Median NR | Expansion Cohorts of Phase I Study including Locally Advanced or Metastatic cSCC |
Migden MR et al. 2020[52] | Cemiplimab | First and Second+ Line | 78 | CR 13% PR 31% ORR 44% |
Median NR KM DOR 89% |
Phase II Locally advanced cSCC Cohort KM 1 year OS 81% KM 1 year PFS 53% |
Richscin D et al. 2020[51] | Cemiplimab | First and Second+ Line | 71 | CR 11% PR 34% ORR 45% |
Median NR KM DOR 90% |
DCR 68% KM 1 year OS 81% KM 1 year PFS 51.2% |
In GK et al. 2020[84] | Cemiplimab (13) Pembrolizumab (7) Nivolumab (6) |
First and second+ Line | 26 | CR 23% PR 19% ORR 42% |
Median 7.6 months | Retrospective study Median PFS 5.4 months |
Maubec E et al. 2020[54] | Pembrolizumab | First Line (31%) Second+ Line (69%) |
57 | CR 8% PR 33% ORR 41% |
Median NR | DCR 60% |
Salzmann M et al. 2020[85] | Cemiplimab (8) Pembrolizumab (28) Nivolumab (10) |
First Line (67%) Second+ Line (33%) |
46 | CR 15% PR 44% ORR 59% |
- | Retrospective study DCR 80% KM 1 year PFS 59% |
Grob JJ et al. 2020[53] | Pembrolizumab | First Line (13%) Second+ Line (87%) |
105 | CR 4% PR 31% ORR 34% |
Median NR | DCR 52.4% Median PFS 6.9 months Median OS NR |
Eton O et al. 2020[86] | Pembrolizumab + panitumumab (1) Nivolumab + panitumumab (1) |
Second+ Line | 2 | CR 100% ORR 100% |
Case series |
Note this table is just a limited sampling of published reports including PD-1 inhibitor therapies for advanced cutaneous SCC.
CR= complete response; PR = partial response; ORR = overall response rate; ST = surgical therapy; RT = radiation therapy; Pts = patients; DCR = Disease Control Rate; DOR= Duration of Response; cSCC = Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma; NR= Not Reached; KR = Kaplan-Meier estimate 12-month estimate