Table 2.
Question | Response |
---|---|
1). Do you find this Program the most suitable solution to deal with patients in treatment with secukinumab? | Score a |
2). In which of the following aspects do you feel more supported? | |
a. Is the patient more followed and aware? | Yes/No |
b. Are the monitoring visits taking less time? | Yes/No |
c. Could you get more information about the patients’ disease management? | Yes/No |
d. Any other relevant aspect? | Yes/No |
3). If Yes to question 2a, in which aspect do you find the patient more followed and aware? | |
a. Management of secukinumab | % |
b. Management of side effects | % |
c. Management of the dermatological aspect | % |
d. Management of the psychological aspect | % |
e. Management of the nutritional aspect | % |
f. Others | % |
4). If Yes to question 2b, what is the average time saved at each monitoring visit? | |
a. <5 minutes | % |
b. 5–10 minutes | % |
c. 10–20 minutes | % |
d. >20 minutes | % |
5). If Yes to question 2c, which kind of information did you get thanks to the Program? | |
a. Patient adherence | % |
b. Compliance with the recommendations | % |
c. Side effects | % |
d. Other? If yes, which aspects could you mention? | % |
6). If Yes to question 2d, which kind of information could you get thanks to the Program in addition to the ones yet mentioned? | |
7). What is your opinion about the overall quality of the Program? | Score a |
Notes: a1 – Did not meet my expectations; 2 – Fairly Satisfactory; 3 – Satisfactory; 4 – Very Satisfactory; 5 – Outstanding.