Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 May 24;149(1):410–421.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.04.036

TABLE IV.

Engraftment and subsequent unplanned cell infusions

First HCT, patients (n = 57) Second HCT, patients (n = 8) Third HCT, patients (n = 1)
Engraftment
 Primary graft failure 2 (4) 0 0
 Secondary graft failure 7 (12) 1 (13) 0
 Unstable chimerism or threatened graft failure (not progressing to graft failure) 4 (7) 2 (25) 0
 Poor graft function 9 (16) 3 (38) 0
Subsequent unplanned cell infusion, no. of patients* 18 (32) 4 (50) 0
 Donor lymphocyte infusion 7 (12) 2 (25) 0
 Repeat HCT 8 (14) 1 (13) 0
 Peripheral blood stem cell boost§ 5 (9) 1 (13) 0

Values are n or n (%).

*

A total of 43 subsequent unplanned cell infusions were administered.

A total of 24 unplanned donor lymphocyte infusions were administered, for mixed chimerism (n = 18), viral infection (n = 2), lymphoma relapse (n = 2), poor graft function (n = 1), promoting immune reconstitution (n = 1).

Indications for repeat HCT included graft failure (n = 6), mixed chimerism (n = 2), and lymphoma relapse (n = 1).

§

A total of 10 stem cell boosts were administered, for poor graft function (n = 9) and to promote immune reconstitution (n = 1, included CD3+ add back).