Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 24;78(3):383–391. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03255-1

Table 2.

Association between H2RA use and adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in the subgroup meta-analysis by various factors

Factors No. of studies Summary HR (95% CI) Heterogeneity, I2 (%) Meta-regression
All9,13,22,24–27 7 0.90 (0.56–1.44) 74.6
Mean age 0.10
 < 60 years24–26 3 1.36 (0.88–1.10) 62.3
 > 60 years9,13,22 3 0.57 (0.33–0.98) 36.7
Administration time of H2RAs 0.43
At-home9,13,22,24 4 0.76 (0.39–1.45) 78.3
In-hospital25–27 3 1.73 (1.29–2.30) 0.0
Specific type of H2RAs 0.42
Famotidine9,22,25–27 5 0.74 (0.33–1.66) 82.2
All13,24 2 1.31 (0.98–1.76) 0.0
Geographical region 0.17
North America9,22,24,26 4 0.64 (0.31–1.33) 80.3
Europe13 1 1.07 (0.46–2.47) NA
Asia25,27 2 1.79 (1.27–2.52) 53.9
Number of participants 0.46
Small (≤ 1000)22,27 2 0.61 (0.25–1.49) 26.1
Large (> 1000)9,13,24–26 5 1.00 (0.60–1.65) 75.9
Confounding adjustment
BMI7,13,22,24 4 0.76 (0.39–1.45) 78.3
Smoking status13,22 2 0.69 (0.31–1.54) 53.2
Steroid use22,27 2 0.61 (0.25–1.49) 26.1
Comorbidity7,13,22,24,26 5 0.71 (0.40–1.28) 73.8
Gastrointestinal disease13,24 2 1.31 (0.98–1.76) 0.0

BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, COVID-19 coronavirus disease 2019, HR hazard ratio, NA not applicable, H2RA histamine H2 receptor antagonist