Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 15;7(6):e207. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1043

Table 5.

Quality appraisal of papers

Study Title/Abstract (2 items) Introduction (2 items) Methods (11 items) Results (3 items) Discussion (1 item Disclosure (2 items) Total % of items met
Dialectical behaviour therapy
Murphy et al15 2 2 7 1.5 0.5 0 13 68.4
Pasieczny & Connor16 0.5 2 5.5 0.5 1 0 9.5 50.0
Priebe et al17 1.5 2 7.5 1.5 1 2 15.5 81.6
Means 1.3 2.0 6.7 1.2 0.8 0.7 12.7 66.7
Cognitive–behavioural therapy
Davidson et al18 1 2 4 2 1 1 11 57.9
Palmer et al19 2 1.5 9.5 2 1 1 17 89.5
Tyrer et al20 0.5 1.5 6.5 3 0.5 1 13 68.4
Means 1.2 1.7 6.7 2.3 0.8 1.0 13.7 71.9
Stepped care
Grenyer et al21 1.5 2 4.5 1.5 1 2 12.5 65.8
Kvarstein et al22 1.5 1.5 5.5 3 1 2 14.5 72.5
Sinnaeve et al23 1 1.5 6 1.5 1 2 13 72.2
Means 1.3 1.7 5.3 2.0 1.0 2.0 13.3 70.2
Nidotherapy
Ranger et al24 1.5 0.5 8.5 1 0.5 0.5 12 66.7
Tyrer et al20 1 1 8 1 1 2 14 82.4
Means 1.3 0.8 8.3 1.0 0.8 1.3 13.0 74.5
Schema therapy
Bamelis et al14 2 2 10.5 1.5 1 2 19 95.0
van Asselt et al26 2 2 10 2 1 2 19 95.0
Means 2.0 2.0 10.3 1.8 1.0 2.0 19 95
Setting
Soeteman et al27 2 2 13.5 2.5 1 0 21 87.5
Soeteman et al28 2 2 12.5 2.5 1 2 22 81.7
Means 2.0 2.0 13.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 21.5 89.6
Other
Blankers et al31 2 2 8 1.5 1 2 16.5 82.5
Borschmann et al29 1 2 8 2 1 1 15 83.3
McMurran et al30 2 2 8 2 0.5 2 16.5 86.8
Means 1.7 2.0 8.0 1.8 0.8 1.7 16.0 84.2