Table 4.
Comparisons of OCD identification for different taboo-themed OCD vignettes
| Test statistic | Effect size a OR [95% CI] or d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Sexual vignette | ||||
| Incorrectly identified (n=39) | Correctly identified (n=35) | |||
| Theoretical orientation N (%) | χ2 (1) = 1.91 | 1.92 [0.91, 4.06) | ||
| Cognitive-behavioral (n=36) | 16 (44%) | 20 (56%) | ||
| Other (n=38) | 23 (61%) | 15 (40%) | ||
| Education N (%) | χ2 (1) = 12.51** | |||
| Bachelor’s degree (n=16) | 13 (81%) | 3 (19%) | 0.19 [0.048, 0.72] | |
| Master’s degree (n=37) | 21 (57%) | 16 (43%) | 1.39 [0.55, 3.46] | |
| Doctoral degree (n=21) | 5 (24%) | 16 (76%) | 5.73 [1.81, 18.09] | |
| Recommended CBT | χ2 (1)= 13.26*** | 6.61 [2.64, 16.59] | ||
| Yes (n=41) | 14 (34%) | 27 (66%) | ||
| No (n=31) | 24 (77%) | 7 (23%) | ||
| Confidence with OCD assessment M (SD) | 7.4 (1.9) | 8.3 (1.5) | t (62) = 2.14* | .54 |
| Years of experience M (SD) | 12.2 (8.4) | 16.1 (10.9) | t (71) = 1.72 | .40 |
|
| ||||
| Aggression/Harm vignette | ||||
| Incorrectly identified (n=29) | Correctly identified (n=40) | |||
| Theoretical orientation N (%) | χ2 (1) = 0.18 | 1.23 [0.57, 2.65] | ||
| Cognitive-behavioral (n=33) | 13 (39%) | 20 (61%) | ||
| Other (n=36) | 16 (44%) | 20 (56%) | ||
| Education | χ2 (1) = 6.60* | |||
| Bachelor’s degree (n=15) | 10 (67%) | 5 (33%) | 0.27 [0.081, 0.91] | |
| Master’s degree (n=33) | 14 (42%) | 19 (58%) | 1.03 [0.40, 2.69] | |
| Doctoral degree (n=21) | 5 (24%) | 16 (76%) | 3.20 [1.01, 10.13] | |
| Recommended CBT | χ2 (1) = 3.83+ | 2.73 [1.20, 6.26] | ||
| Yes (n=34) | 11 (32%) | 23 (68%) | ||
| No (n=30) | 17 (57%) | 13 (43%) | ||
| Confidence with OCD assessment M (SD) | 7.7 (1.8) | 8.0 (1.7) | t (60) = 0.40 | d = .22 |
| Years of experience M (SD) | 11.7 (7.6) | 16.3 (10.7) | t (66) = 1.94 | d = .48 |
|
| ||||
| Religion vignette | ||||
| Incorrectly identified (n=26) | Correctly identified (n=49) | |||
| Theoretical orientation N (%) | χ2 (1) = 0.15 | 1.21 [0.57, 2.55] | ||
| Cognitive-behavioral (n=34) | 11 (32%) | 23 (68%) | ||
| Other (n=41) | 15 (37%) | 26 (63%) | ||
| Education | χ2 (1) = 5.33 | |||
| Bachelor’s degree (n=15) | 9 (60%) | 6 (40%) | 0.26 [0.081, 0.85] | |
| Master’s degree (n=38) | 11 (29%) | 27 (71%) | 0.60 [0.23, 1.56] | |
| Doctoral degree (n=22) | 6 (27%) | 16 (73%) | 1.62 [0.54, 4.81] | |
| Recommended CBT | χ2 (1) = 13.97*** | 7.29 [3.12, 16.98] | ||
| Yes (n=43) | 7 (16%) | 36 (84%) | ||
| No (n=29) | 17 (59%) | 12 (42%) | ||
| Confidence with OCD assessment M (SD) | 7.1 (2.0) | 8.2 (1.5) | t (61) = 2.31* | .62 |
| Years of experience M (SD) | 13.2 (10.5) | 15.3 (10.1) | t (72) = 0.86 | .21 |
+
p = .05
*
p < .05
**
p < .01
***
p < .001
a
ORs in the education comparison were calculated by comparing the odds of correct identification in one educational group vs. the two others pools (e.g., doctoral proportion of correct identification vs. combined bachelor’s and master’s correct identification)