Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 15.

Published in final edited form as: Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2021 Nov 2;154:112751. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112751

Figure 1. — (A) Encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and loading capacity (LC, mg/g-WPI) of mixtures with 10.0 mg/mL WPI and 0.6–2.0 mg/mL apigenin (AP) after the pH-cycle treatment; (B) STEM image of the nanodispersion prepared with 2.0 mg/mL AP in 10.0 mg/mL WPI; (C) Size distributions of pH 7.0 nanodispersions prepared with (1) 0.6, (2) 1.0, (3) 1.5, or (4) 2.0 mg/mL AP during 30-day storage at 21 °C. Error bars are SD (n = 3). Different letters above columns in (A) represent significant difference within the same encapsulation property (p < 0.05).

Figure 1. — (A) Encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and loading capacity (LC, mg/g-WPI) of mixtures with 10.0 mg/mL WPI and 0.6–2.0 mg/mL apigenin (AP) after the pH-cycle treatment; (B) STEM image of the nanodispersion prepared with 2.0 mg/mL AP in 10.0 mg/mL WPI; (C) Size distributions of pH 7.0 nanodispersions prepared with (1) 0.6, (2) 1.0, (3) 1.5, or (4) 2.0 mg/mL AP during 30-day storage at 21 °C. Error bars are SD (n = 3). Different letters above columns in (A) represent significant difference within the same encapsulation property (p < 0.05).