2.14. Analysis.

Comparison 2 Urethral vs intermittent catheterisation, Outcome 14 Post‐catheter quality of life.

Post‐catheter quality of life
Study	Transurethral Catheter	Clean Intermittent Catheter	Significance
Postcatheter Pain Score (VAS 0‐100)
Hakvoort 2011	34 (n = 42)	29 (n = 45)	P = 0.45
Catheterisation difficulty (VAS 0‐100)
Hakvoort 2011	36 (n = 42)	28 (n = 45)	P = 0.20
Postcatheter Patient Satisfaction (VAS 0‐100)
Hakvoort 2011	76 (n = 42)	80 (n = 45)	P = 0.41
EQ‐5D scores; mean score (n of patients)
Halleberg 2013	Discharge 0.32 (n = 52) 4 weeks 0.62 (n = 52) 4 months 0.68 (n = 52) Gained QALYs 0.093 (n = 52)	0.32 (n = 57) 0.56 (n = 57) 0.73 (n = 57) 0.090 (n = 57)	P = 0.904
EQ VAS scores; mean score (n of patients)
Halleberg 2013	Discharge 0.52 (n = 51) 4 weeks 0.65 (n = 51) 4 months 0.68 (n = 51) Gained QALYs 0.044 (n=51)	0.52 (n = 54) 0.63 (n = 54) 0.69 (n = 54) 0.045 (n = 54)	P = 0.978
SF‐6D scores; mean scores (n of patients)
Halleberg 2013	Discharge 0.50 (n = 45) 4 weeks 0.60 (n = 45) 4 months 0.63 (n = 45) Gained QALYs 0.036 (n = 45)	0.51 (n = 45) 0.58 (n = 45) 0.65 (n = 45) Gained QALYs 0.032 (n = 45)	P = 0.616