Table 2.
Author | Year | Country/region | Intervention cycle (number of times) | Grouping | Baseline age (years) | Baseline number | Drop-off number | Male composition ratio (%) | MMSE | MoCA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liu | 2015 | Canada | 48 | INT | 62.90 (12.10) | 25 | 1 | 60 | 24.80 (2.60) | |
D-INT | 66.90 (9.00) | 21.80 (6.90) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
Park | 2019 | South Korea | 18 | DT | 56.30 (7.14) | 30 | 0 | 69.2 | 26.50 (2.52) | |
COT | 59.75 (7.75) | 25.60 (2.91) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
Ploughman | 2019 | Canada | 30 | Aerobic+COG | 62.10 (14.20) | 52 | 0 | 36 | 23.30 (7.50) | |
Aerobic+games | 58.40 (11.70) | 24.90 (4.80) | ||||||||
Activity+COG | 63.90 (8.50) | 24.90 (4.70) | ||||||||
Activity+games | 69.70 (8.90) | 21.90 (5.40) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
Wang | 2019 | China | 36 | TT | 66.68 (2.44) | 225 | 46 | 55.6 | 17.45 (5.62) | |
PE | 65.12 (2.56) | 16.82 (5.83) | ||||||||
CT | 67.51 (2.24) | 15.69 (6.21) | ||||||||
CO | 64.36 (2.31) | 16.79 (6.35) | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
Yeh | 2019 | Taiwan | 36 | Sequential group | 50.63 (3.99) | 30 | 0 | 70 | 25.80 (0.92) | 20.07 (1.08) |
Control group | 60.21 (3.10) | 24.57 (0.78) | 18.79 (1.36) |
INT: intervention; D-INT: delayed intervention; DT: dual-task training; COT: conventional occupational therapy; COG: cognitive training or games; TT: combined intervention of physical exercise and cognitive training; PE: physical exercise; CT: cognitive training; CO: control group; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment.