Table II.
Comparison of various features of RRD reported in other recently published studies; NA = not available, n = number, RRD = Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, PVR = proliferative vitreo-retinopathy, LP = lockdown period.
| Study | Frequency of RRD | Age (Mean years) | Time of presentation (Mean days) | On Status of Macula (Percentage frequency) | PVR | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shams et al.12 | n=43 vs 86 (weekly) before LP | NA | NA | 34.9 vs 44.2% before LP | NA | Decline in presentation |
| Jasani et al.13 | n=46 vs 86 before LP | NA | NA | 32.6 vs 47.7% before LP | 8.7 vs 2.3% before LP | Decline in presentation |
| Awad et al.14 | n= 37 vs 92 before LP | NA | 14.8 vs 22.5 before LP | 32.4 vs 47.8 % before LP | 24.3 vs 9.8% before LP | Decline in presentation |
| Patel et al.15 | n=82 vs 111 before LP | 58.5 vs 59.0 before LP | 5.5 vs 4 before LP | 24.4 vs 49.5% before LP | 13.4 vs 4.5% before LP | Decline in presentation |
| Arjamand et al.16 | n= 87 vs 100 before LP | 57.79 vs 56.02 before LP | 18.89 vs 17.26 before LP | 29.9 vs 49 % before LP | NA | Decline in presentation |
| This study | n= 28 vs 24 before LP | 43.2 vs 48.4 before LP | 28.51 vs 69.38 before LP | 7.1 vs 16.7% before LP | 25 vs 45.8% before LP | Increase in presentation |