Table III.

Enablers of the Multi Source Feedback.

Categories	Reference quotations
Raters characteristics	“The raters should be those individuals that you have an interaction with. Head Nurse has barely spoken to me since I came.”
	“The sincerity of seniors that they actually want me to improve compelled me to improve my skills and behavior.”
	“It was given in a very positive environment and affectionate way making me actually receptive to it.”
	“All the raters must be transparent. It helped me because all the individuals were neutral it gave me a blueprint of myself. ”
Content of feedback	“According to me the confidentiality of the feedback was important as if a person is weak in something you do not go and announce it to all demoralizing him in front of all.”
	“It must be transparent if not, ultimately it will be harmful for him instigating negative behavior”
	“To get the feedback from multiple seniors saying the same things individually independent from each other adds to transparency, quality and credibility making a sharp impact on me.”
	“To get the feedback from multiple seniors saying the same things individually independent from each other adds to transparency, quality and credibility making a sharp impact on me.”
	“Everybody gave me the lowest remarks, however when I asked my other colleagues they did not approve of my feedback.”
	“It should be bilateral i.e., junior doctors can also have concerns regarding some of their seniors.”
Format	“I think Implementing the MSF at earlier Level such as schools, Colleges and medical schools will have a greater impact”
	“The assessment must be at two parts, one at the start and then onwards every three months to know how much improvements have you made.”
	“The format is quite good but it should include orientation session at the start of MSF which should give an outline to the rater about what aspects you will be judged in.”