Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;53(6):2372–2411. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x

Table 3.

Correlations (with 99.5% confidence intervals) between individual-differences predictor constructs and task-unrelated thought (TUT) rates, in the SART and flanker task, across probe-type conditions

Predictor Outcome Content (“What”) Probes Intentionality (“Why”) Probes Depth (“HowMuch”) probes
Executive control
SART TUTs r(264) = −.32 [−.47, −.16] r(261) = −.16 [−.32, .01] r(267) = −.22 [−.38, −.05]
Flanker TUTs r(264) = −.22 [−.38, −.05] r(261) = −.04 [−.21, .13] r(267) = −.10 [−.27, .07]
Distractibility and restlessness
SART TUTs r(205) = .06 [−.14, .25] r(199) = .25 [.06, .43] r(203) = .08 [−.12, .27]
Flanker TUTs r(205) = .21 [.02, .39] r(199) = .28 [.09, .45] r(203) = .11 [−.09, .30]
Positive-constructive daydreaming
SART TUTs r(205) = .06 [−.14, .25] r(199) = .29 [.10, .46] r(203) = .03 [−.17, .22]
Flanker TUTs r(205) = .18 [−.01, .36] r(199) = .30 [.11, .47] r(203) = .17 [−.03, .35]

Executive control reflects factor scores from a confirmatory factor analysis of four cognitive performance measures (see text for details); Distractibility and restlessness reflects z-score composites of seven questionnaire measures (see text for details); Positive-constructive daydreaming reflects z-score composites of four questionnaire measures (see text for details)