Table 1.
Authors | Study period | Study design | Sample size | Study group | Mean hernia width/length (cm) | Hybrid robotic repair | Robotic platform | Follow-up (days) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rTAR | oTAR | rTAR | oTAR | |||||||
Abdu et al. [8] | 2016–2018 | Retro–PSM | 380 | 95 | 285 | 12/19 | 12/19 | Yes | NR | 30 |
Bittner et al. [9] | 2015–2016 | Retro | 102 | 26 | 76 | 12.3 ± 3/18.5 ± 5.1 | 13.7 ± 5.9/17.1 ± 7.1 | No | Da Vinci Si + Xi | 90 |
Dauser et al. [10] | 2017–2019 | Retro | 26 | 16 | 10 | NR | NR | No | Da Vinci Si | 30 |
Halka et al. [11] | 2013–2017 | Retro | 183 | 49 | 134 | 38.8 ± 6.7/41.6 ± 6.1 | 37.4 ± 8.3/42.2 ± 9.1 | Yes | Da Vinci Xi | 30 |
Martin-del-Campo et al. [12] | 2015–2016 | Retro | 114 | 38 | 76 | 13.5 ± 4.5/NR | 13.5 ± 4.5/NR | No | NR | NR |
Reeves et al. [13] | 2018–2020 | Retro | 26 | 13 | 13 | NR | NR | No | Da Vinci Xi | 30 |
rTAR robotic transversus abdominis release, oTAR open transversus abdominis release, NR not reported, Retro retrospective study, PSM propensity score matching