Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;25(6):1471–1480. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02487-5

Table 1.

Details of studies selected for meta-analysis

Authors Study period Study design Sample size Study group Mean hernia width/length (cm) Hybrid robotic repair Robotic platform Follow-up (days)
rTAR oTAR rTAR oTAR
Abdu et al. [8] 2016–2018 Retro–PSM 380 95 285 12/19 12/19 Yes NR 30
Bittner et al. [9] 2015–2016 Retro 102 26 76 12.3 ± 3/18.5 ± 5.1 13.7 ± 5.9/17.1 ± 7.1 No Da Vinci Si + Xi 90
Dauser et al. [10] 2017–2019 Retro 26 16 10 NR NR No Da Vinci Si 30
Halka et al. [11] 2013–2017 Retro 183 49 134 38.8 ± 6.7/41.6 ± 6.1 37.4 ± 8.3/42.2 ± 9.1 Yes Da Vinci Xi 30
Martin-del-Campo et al. [12] 2015–2016 Retro 114 38 76 13.5 ± 4.5/NR 13.5 ± 4.5/NR No NR NR
Reeves et al. [13] 2018–2020 Retro 26 13 13 NR NR No Da Vinci Xi 30

rTAR robotic transversus abdominis release, oTAR open transversus abdominis release, NR not reported, Retro retrospective study, PSM propensity score matching