Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2021 Nov 24;12:6818. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27090-1

Solution-processable and functionalizable ultra-high molecular weight polymers via topochemical synthesis

Christopher L Anderson 1,2, He Li 1,3,#, Christopher G Jones 4,#, Simon J Teat 5, Nicholas S Settineri 2,5, Eric A Dailing 1, Jiatao Liang 1,2, Haiyan Mao 6, Chongqing Yang 1, Liana M Klivansky 1, Xinle Li 1, Jeffrey A Reimer 6, Hosea M Nelson 4,✉, Yi Liu 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC8613210  PMID: 34819494

Abstract

Topochemical polymerization reactions hold the promise of producing ultra-high molecular weight crystalline polymers. However, the totality of topochemical polymerization reactions has failed to produce ultra-high molecular weight polymers that are both soluble and display variable functionality, which are restrained by the crystal-packing and reactivity requirements on their respective monomers in the solid state. Herein, we demonstrate the topochemical polymerization reaction of a family of para-azaquinodimethane compounds that undergo facile visible light and thermally initiated polymerization in the solid state, allowing for the first determination of a topochemical polymer crystal structure resolved via the cryoelectron microscopy technique of microcrystal electron diffraction. The topochemical polymerization reaction also displays excellent functional group tolerance, accommodating both solubilizing side chains and reactive groups that allow for post-polymerization functionalization. The thus-produced soluble ultra-high molecular weight polymers display superior capacitive energy storage properties. This study overcomes several synthetic and characterization challenges amongst topochemical polymerization reactions, representing a critical step toward their broader application.

Subject terms: Polymer synthesis, Polymer characterization

Topochemical polymerization reactions produce ultra-high molecular weight crystalline polymers. Here the authors show a family of para-azaquinodimethane compounds that undergo facile visible light and thermally initiated polymerization in the solid state and the crystal structure has been resolved via cryoelectron microscopy.

Introduction

Topochemical polymerizations (TCPs) are solid-state transformations, wherein monomers crystallize in an alignment such that some external stimulus—most often heat and/or light—causes them to polymerize1–5. TCP reactions are freed from many of the constraints of their solution-based counterparts and are capable of producing ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polymers—those with number-averaged molecular weights (Mn) above 106 Dalton6–8, in a stereospecific, regioregular, solvent-free, and catalyst-free manner. TCP reactions are relatively rare, however, due to the fact that TCP monomers must crystallize such that the distances between their reactive sites (dCCs) are small enough to allow for their polymerization to proceed without significant movement or deformation in each of the monomers1,3,4,9. The vast majority of examples make use of two categories of reactions: cycloaddition reactions that involve polyolefins10–13, oligo(aza)anthracenes14–17, alkynes/azide18–21 and alkene/azides22; and addition reactions between reactive groups, such as diynes3,6,23–25, triynes26–28, dienes29–32, trienes33, para-quinodimethanes9,34–41 and bis(indanone)s8,42,43. In addition to linear polymers, TCP reactions have also been used to produce a number of intriguing extended materials, such as porous 2D25,42,44–51 and 3D polymer crystals52.

To date, the utility of TCP reactions as a polymerization technique has not been adequately demonstrated as the crystalline polymers so produced are often insoluble, or in the cases of soluble ones, their molecular weights are typically quite limited12. In addition, the functional groups cannot be varied without drastically affecting their TCP reactivity6,9,42. As hinted at by others previously, an alternative strategy to produce a wide variety of useful UHMW polymers from TCP reactions would be to make use of a monomeric structure that incorporates both the solubilizing sidechains and a reactive functional group that survives the TCP reaction, allowing for postpolymerization functionalization3,23,53. If successful, this method would represent one of the few routes to soluble UHMW polymers with functionality that is not significantly restrained by the polymerization conditions54–57.

In this work, we demonstrate that a family of para-azaquinodimethanes (AQMs) shows a tempered form of the reactivity displayed by their unsubstituted structural cousin, para-quinodimethane, undergoing robust light and thermally initiated single-crystal polymerization while accommodating both the reactive and solubilizing groups58,59. The bestowed solution processability enables the fabrication of dielectric film capacitors that show excellent capacitive energy storage properties.

Results

Monomer synthesis, topochemical polymerization, and characterization

The AQM ditriflates in this study (Fig. 1a) employ substituted phenyl or phenolic end groups, which are homologues of the previously reported thiophene-end capped AQMs60,61. The substitution of the aromatic end groups of these AQMs yielded an unexpected change in their solid-state reactivity. While the thienylidene AQMs are photochemically and thermally stable in the solid state, the new AQM series display remarkable solid-state reactivity that is suitable for TCP applications.

Fig. 1. Single-crystal polymerization of a family of AQM ditriflates.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a The structures of the AQM ditriflates, 1–4, studied herein. Monomers 1–3 underwent topochemical polymerization under the effects of heat and/or light to produce polymers P1–P3. NR: no reaction. b–c Photographs and optical microscope images of vials containing crystals of (b) 1 and (c) P1, showing the typical morphology of crystals. Scale bar: 1 mm. d–f 13C-NMR spectra of polymers P1–P3. Cross-polarization/magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) solid-state 13C-NMR spectra of (d) P1, and (e) P2 (asterisks denote spinning side bands). (f) Solution 13C-NMR spectrum of P3 (solvent: CDCl3). All carbon resonances are annotated by colored circles. The resonances in d–f between 49–53 ppm (red) indicate the presence of the sp3 carbons generated during polymerization, and the CF3 multiplets (expected ratio of 1:3:3:1, but only the two highest peaks are observed) between 117 and 120 ppm (orange) show that the triflate groups remain intact.

The synthesis of the AQM ditriflate monomers 1–4 was accomplished in high yield following a succinct synthetic route (Supplementary Fig. 2)60–62. The four monomers produced long-aspect ratio yellow needle or hair-like crystals under all of the attempted crystallization conditions (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 3 and 4). Crystals of monomers 1–3 decolorized when exposed to ambient sunlight or heating above 80 °C, indicating that they undergo solid-state polymerization reactions to produce the nonconjugated poly-p-xylylene derivatives P1–P3 (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3, and Supplementary Movie 1)9,35,41. The solid-state reactivity of the phenyl-substituted AQM monomers 1–3 differs from the monomer 4, which is not affected by light and/or heat. After polymerization, crystals of P1 and P2 become insoluble, while those of P3 readily dissolve in many common mid-range polarity organic solvents. In contrast to previously reported TCP systems—including the closely related substituted para-quinodimethanes and quinone methides—the solid-state reactivity of diphenylidine-substituted AQMs were surprisingly forgiving to the inclusion of long alkyl groups9,35,36,40,41. Additionally, unlike many other methods of producing UHMW polymers, this method is insensitive to the presence of water and oxygen and requires no catalysts or auxiliaries54–57.

The structures of polymers P1–P3 were confirmed by a variety of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and infrared (IR) spectroscopic studies. The solubility of polymer P3 allows for solution-phase 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR characterizations, which show broadened peaks typical of polymers along with chemical shifts and integrals consistent with the proposed structure (Fig. 1d–f and Supplementary Figs. 52–54). In particular, the characteristic resonance corresponding to the exocyclic methylene protons in the 1H NMR spectrum of 3 at δ = 6.82 ppm is absent in that of P3 (Supplementary Fig. 59). Instead, a resonance corresponding to the xylyl protons at δ = 4.95 ppm is observed. The solution 13C-NMR spectrum of P3, along with cross-polarization/magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) solid-state 13C-NMR spectra of P1 and P2, further corroborate the proposed polymer structures, showing the expected resonances corresponding to the xylyl carbons around 50 ppm and the absence of the exocyclic methylene carbon resonances of their respective monomers. As these NMR spectra are taken on unpurified polymer samples, it can be concluded that the conversions from 1–3 to P1–P3 in the solid state proceed quantitatively. In addition, the features with a characteristic splitting at 117–121 ppm in the polymers’ 13C-NMR spectra can be attributed to the CF3 groups within the triflates appended to each repeat unit. This feature, together with a slightly broadened peak at –73.8 ppm in the 19F NMR spectrum of P3, confirms that the triflate groups appended to monomers 1–3 remain intact through the polymerization process (Supplementary Fig. 53).

The proposed TCP reaction was further supported by IR spectroscopic studies (Supplementary Figs. 5 and 6). The characteristic vibrational features at 1570–1635 cm–1 in the IR spectrum of 1 is not observed in the spectrum of P135,58. With the help of computations, these features can be assigned to the stretching mode of the quinoidal AQM ring, supporting the conclusion that the quinoidal rings have been consumed during the polymerization reaction.

The solid-state polymerization of monomers 1 and 2 produces insoluble polymeric products, for which molecular weight information cannot be obtained experimentally. However, the solubility of P3 allows for the evaluation of its molecular weight information via conventional size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Monomer 3 could be crystallized via the slow-evaporation of its solutions in different common solvents, which, when polymerized, produce a variable range of molecular weights (Supplementary Fig. 7). The highest molecular weight polymer—produced from crystals of 3 grown via the slow evaporation of a toluene solution—yields a Mn = 1.9 × 106, a Mw = 3.9 × 106, and a polydispersity index of 1.99. The differences in molar mass and polydispersity are attributed to the variations of crystallite domain sizes in the monomer crystals, determined by defect sites in the parent crystal and fragmentation during the polymerization, which are highly solvent and process dependent12.

Crystal structure determination by X-ray and electron diffractions

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of monomers 1–4 provide more insights into their solid-state packing and polymerization. In all four monomers, the central AQM unit displays a bond-length alternation pattern characteristic of a quinoidal ring and sits coplanar with its phenyl end groups (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 12–15). These π systems further stack into extended columns with close π-π interplanar distances in the range of 3.26–3.42 Å. Notably, the distances between the active methylenes on neighboring AQMs in the solid state (dCCs) in the three topochemically active monomers (1–3) are 3.62(6), 3.57(6), and 3.76(8) Å, respectively. Such small dCC distances are a necessity in topochemical polymerizations, as they require minimal atomic movement or deformation of the unit cell in order to form the new bonds, and thus preserve macroscopic crystal integrity and produce high molecular weight polymers4,8,9. In contrast to monomers 1–3, the reactive methylene carbons on each molecule of 4 are not close enough to either of its neighbors’ to allow for TCP. Large dCC values of 4.98(3) and 5.13(8) Å—depending on which methylene carbons are presumed to react—are found in the solid-state of 4, which are significantly larger than those in monomers 1–3 and other polymerizable examples in the para-quinodimethane family and explain its lack of topochemical reactivity9,35,36,40,41.

Fig. 2. Solid-state structures of monomer 2 and polymer P2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a X-ray crystal structure of 2 showing molecular structure, and dCC—the distance between reactive sites of two neighboring molecules. b CryoEM structure of polymer P2 showing the unit cell structure (top), and a dimeric unit (bottom). c Scanning electron microscopy image of crystals of P2 on a TEM grid similar to those used to obtain its structure by cryoEM. Scale bar: 10 μm. d and e Analogous views of the columnar stacks of monomer 2 and the polymeric chains of P2. Atom color scheme: carbon = gray, nitrogen = blue, oxygen = red, sulfur = yellow, fluorine = green, hydrogen = white, magenta balls represent the truncated polymer chain in polymer P2.

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) studies of crystals of 1–3 and polymers P1–P3 showed a retention of crystallinity upon polymerization but with apparent changes in the diffraction patterns in all three cases (Supplementary Fig. 11). In the case of P2 and P3, the (100) diffraction peak position is nearly identical to that of the respective monomers, in accordance with very small lattice changes upon polymerization. Significant changes of the rest of the patterns, together with all other experimental evidences (DSC, NMR, IR, SEC, UV-vis, solubility), corroborate well with the complete monomer-to-polymer transformation. All attempts at obtaining a polymeric crystal structure using synchrotron X-ray crystallography proved unsatisfactory due to the loss of single-crystal quality after TCP reaction. As the polymerization propagates from the outer surface to the inner zone of the monomer crystal, the strain causes the crystals to break into smaller pieces. While further optimization of the TCP reaction at different temperatures and irradiation conditions may facilitate single-crystal X-ray studies, we have sought to a convenient alternative that requires minimal crystal growth effort. Through a facile dip-coating procedure, monomer 2 microcrystals were deposited on TEM grids, and polymerized in situ to provide P2 microcrystals (Fig. 2, Supplementary Figs. 2, 20 and 21) that were structurally analyzed via the cryoelectron microscopy (cryoEM) technique of microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED). This strategy obviates the challenges of obtaining TCP product crystal structures with X-ray diffraction and may prove useful in other contexts that were previously inaccessible through traditional structural characterization methods63. The successful crystallographic analysis of P2-coated grids yielded a 1 Å resolution structure of polymer P2 in the solid state (Fig. 2, Supplementary Figs. 16 and 22). The structure of polymer P2 shows the expected highly substituted poly-p-xylylene structure. Each repeat unit is joined in a single bond between two tetrahedral carbons with a regiospecificity analogous to the 1,6-addition polymerizations of p-QMs to form poly-p-xylylenes. The planar monomer 2 molecules deform upon polymerization, such that the pyrazine rings in each repeat unit of P2 are coplanar with each other, and 66° out of plane with their appended 4-n-butylphenyl rings. The simulated PXRD based on the cryoEM structure of P2 shows a similar pattern to the experimental room temperature PXRD of P2 except a noticeable shift of all the peaks to higher angle (Supplementary Fig. 17). Such differences are ascribed to temperature-induced lattice expansion that is well observed in crystalline polymers64,65, since the former is based on structures obtained at cryogenic temperature while the latter is from room temperature (RT) measurements. While we are experimentally limited to conduct PXRD measurements at cryogenic temperatures, we have verified the thermal lattice expansion behavior at above-RT conditions. Variable temperature PXRD studies conducted between room temperature and 100 oC clearly indicate a consistent lattice expansion upon increasing the temperature (Supplementary Figs. 18a and 19), corroborating with the trend of PXRD peak shifts shown in Supplementary Fig. 17. The successful crystal structure determination represents an unprecedented TCP product structure determined with atomic resolution by microED, which achieves a high degree of structural accuracy despite its slightly lower precision in bond length and angles. The results highlight the advantage of electron diffraction for polymer structural determination in comparison to X-ray analysis, which requires single crystals several orders of magnitude larger, as well as single-particle analysis, which requires monodisperse but rotationally-nonuniform high molecular weight compounds63.

Optical and thermal characterization of the polymerization

The polymerizations of 1–3 are not limited to single crystals but readily occur in polycrystalline powders and thin films as well. Films of monomers 1–3 could be easily obtained via spin-coating and polymerize within minutes when exposed to ambient light and overnight in the dark at room temperature to yield films of P1–P3—a transformation that can be directly observed by taking UV-Vis scans at regular intervals (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 25). Visible-light triggered TCP reactions such as these are rare but preferable over higher-frequencies as visible light sources are comparatively safe and accessible8,42. The conversions of 1–3 to P1–P3 are accompanied by marked shifts in their absorption and fluorescence behavior (Supplementary Figs. 23 and 24). As typified by a film of monomer 1, upon polymerization, the three visible region absorbance subpeaks recede and one new ultraviolet absorbance appears. This shift in absorbance is consistent with the shortening of the chromophoric conjugated unit upon polymerization. During the polymerization process, no intermediate absorbances appear and then recede; instead, an isosbestic point is observed at λ = 334 nm, indicating that the polymerization occurs via a mechanism with no major intermediates or side-products. Similar features are seen in the polymerizations of 2 and 3.

Fig. 3. Optical and thermal interrogation of the topochemical polymerization of AQMs and capacitive energy storage properties of polymer P3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a UV-Vis scanning kinetic curves of a film of 1 (gold) as it polymerizes to form P1 (ruby) over the course of roughly eight hours. b and c DSC studies of monomer 3 and the in-situ thermally polymerized P3. b the first heating (gold), and the subsequent cycle (ruby) of 3 as it polymerizes to P3. c multiple heating and cooling cycles (ruby = first four cycles, blue = final cycle) of P3. d Comparative electric displacement-electric field (D-E) loops at 200 MV m–1 showing the effective K values derived therefrom. e discharged energy density plots as a function of the electric field, showing the superior energy storage properties of P3 against parylene-C and BOPP (BOPP = biaxially oriented polypropylene; error bars represent standard deviations obtained from at least three measurements using different samples).

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies performed on 1–3 between 0 and 270 °C all show large exothermic features with their maxima centered around 100 °C on the first heating sweeps, corresponding to the thermally induced, exothermic polymerization reaction (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 8). After the first heating, the samples were fully converted to their polymeric forms. Subsequent heating and cooling cycles give featureless traces for P1 and P2 (Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9), showing the lack of thermal transitions under the degradation temperature (~300 °C as determined by thermogravimetric analysis, Supplementary Fig. 10). In contrast, P3 shows two small repeatable peaks in both the heating and cooling sweeps of its DSC (Fig. 3c), although variable temperature PXRD did not show significant changes of diffraction patterns during these transitions (Supplementary Fig. 18b). It is postulated that these transitions may correspond to thermally induced reorganization of side chains though the exact reason remains undetermined.

Dielectric capacitive energy storage properties

Polymer P3 was anticipated to show a high dielectric constant (K) and other desirable properties as a polymer dielectric due to the rotatable and highly polar triflate groups on each of its repeat units66,67. The facile solution processability of P3 allows for it to be recast into thin films for dielectric capacitor devices. An effective K of 8.14 is obtained for P3, which is notably higher than that of the structurally related poly-p-xylylene, parylene-C (K = 2.87), as well as the widely applied biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) (K = 2.29) (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 27). Together with a high breakdown strength of 568 MV m–1 (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 28) and high charge–discharge efficiencies (>97% at 200 MV m–1) (Supplementary Fig. 29), the P3-based film capacitor delivers a high discharged energy density of 8.54 J cm–3. Additionally, the energy density of P3-based capacitors shows less than 2% variation over 50,000 consecutive charge–discharge cycles, indicating that this polymer is highly stable under high-voltage conditions (Supplementary Fig. 30). It is widely understood in the field of dielectrics that there is a fundamental tradeoff between the charge–discharge efficiency and discharged energy density of a dielectric material66,67. Despite this, polymer P3-based capacitors showed the best combination of these two metrics reported thus far under the benchmark condition of 200 MV m–1 (Supplementary Fig. 31).

Postpolymerization modification

The triflate substituents on monomers 1–3 remain intact through the polymerization process, allowing for the tuning of the resultant polymeric material’s properties via postpolymerization functionalization. Due to its facile solution characterization, P3 was chosen as a model polymer to explore the substitution reaction with the amine nucleophiles dihexylamine and 4-methylbenzylamine. The substitution reactions occurred readily to produce P3-A and P3-B, respectively, as verified by solution NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Figs. 55–58). The 1H NMR spectra of P3-A and P3-B showed that 37 and 57% of the triflate groups in P3 were displaced by dihexylamine and 4-methylbenzylamine, respectively, with their 19F NMR spectra showing the presence of the remaining intact triflates (Fig. 4, Supplementary Figs. 56 and 58).

Fig. 4. Postpolymerization functionalization of polymer P3 with amines.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

a The synthesis of two amine-functionalized polymers from reacting polymer P3 with primary and secondary amine nucleophiles. b–d 1H NMR spectra of (b) polymer P3 and its postpolymerization functionalization products, (c) P3-A and (d) P3-B, showing 37%, and 57% triflate replacement, respectively. All proton resonances are annotated by colored circles.

Discussion

AQM-based TCP reactions were shown to generate solution-processable UHMW polymers with excellent dielectric properties and controllable functionality. This method of synthesizing functionalized UHMW polymers exhibits notable advantages that overcome the constraints of previously reported TCP reactions, rendering it more amenable to practical use. In addition, the use of cryoEM for the structural determination of a TCP product crystal was demonstrated, obviating the need for large X-ray-quality polymer single crystals. While there is inherit restraint with regard to data collection under the employed TEM conditions, which results in relatively lower data/parameter ratio and precision for microED structures than for the X-ray structures, quantitative analysis in terms of root mean square (RMS) deviation between the electron and X-ray structures has shown a high degree of accuracy68 despite the experimental limitations of electron diffraction in its current state69.

The family of AQM ditriflates that undergo TCP is likely to be much larger than the few detailed here. Together with the demonstrated ability to undergo postpolymerization reactions, this reaction motif provides a wide access to diverse structures and functions, which facilitates future optimization of their capacitance properties. These advances allow TCP reactions to function as another practical tool in the toolbox of polymer chemists, opening up applications that were inaccessible before.

Methods

Monomers 1–4 were generated analogously to a previously published two-step synthetic route60,61 and the synthetic details were described in detail in Supplementary Information. X-ray quality single crystals of monomers 1–4 were obtained via the slow evaporation of their solutions in toluene, CH2Cl2, CHCl3, or tetrahydrofuran in the dark. Crystals of monomers 1–3 were polymerized over roughly three days on a windowsill that receives regular sunlight. TEM grids were decorated with microcrystals of polymer P2 for cryoEM by dipping them in 10 mg mL–1 solutions of 2, allowing them to air dry, and then polymerizing in an analogous way to the larger crystals. Polymer P3 was functionalized with primary and secondary amines by stirring a solution of the polymer in 1,4-dioxane to 100 °C for 5 days with 10 equivalents of the amine per repeat unit of the polymer. The functionalized polymers P3-A and P3-B were isolated via precipitation with methanol, followed by filtration and purified by washing the precipitate with different solvents. Polymer film capacitors were generated using ~3 μm-thick films of polymer P3 drop-cast on ITO-coated glass substrates from a 6.7 mg mL–1 solution in tetrahydrofuran. After thermally treating the films at 105 °C for 24 h, 30 nm gold electrodes were deposited on the top of the films. The dielectric and capacitive properties were measured using a PK-CPE1801 high-voltage test system containing a Trek 610D amplifier (PolyK Technologies, LLC, USA).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (49.7MB, pdf)
41467_2021_27090_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (76.1KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (17.1MB, mp4)

Acknowledgements

H.L. and Y.L. acknowledge the support from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 within the Inorganic/Organic Nanocomposites Program (KC3104). Work at the Molecular Foundry and Advanced Light Source was supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. MicroED at UCLA were supported by generous funding from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. We thank Dr. Steve Shelton and Dr. Jian Zhang from the Molecular Foundry for their help with structural characterization. We thank Dr. Matthew Kolaczkowski for his useful advice. We also thank Dr. Hassan Celik, Dr. Nanette Jarenwattananon, and the SSNMR facility at the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley for assistance with solid-state NMR measurements.

Author contributions

C.L.A. synthesized, crystallized, and polymerized all chemicals used in the study with help from J.L., C.Y., and E.A.D. under the supervision of Y.L. C.L.A. wrote the manuscript with editing help from all of the other co-authors. H.L. conducted the SEM measurements, fabricated the capacitor devices, and generated all-dielectric data under the supervision of Y.L. CryoEM structure was obtained by C.G.J. under the supervision of H.M.N. X-ray crystallography was performed, and structures were refined by S.J.T. and N.S.S. SEC molecular weight data was obtained by C.L.A. and E.A.D. under the supervision of Y.L. Solid-state NMRs were obtained by H.M. under the supervision of J.A.R. VT-PXRD data were obtained by L.K. under the supervision of Y.L. PXRD data were obtained by C.L.A. and X.L. under the supervision of Y.L.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The crystallographic data of monomers 1–4 and P2 generated in this study have been deposited to Cambridge Structural Database under accession code 2102275, 2102276, 2102277, 2102278, and 2102279, respectively.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Kana Sureshan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: He Li, Christopher G. Jones.

Contributor Information

Hosea M. Nelson, Email: hosea@chem.ucla.edu

Yi Liu, Email: yliu@lbl.gov.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-27090-1.

References

  • 1.Cohen, M. D. & Schmidt, G. M. J. 383. Topochemistry. Part i. A survey. J. Chem. Soc. 383, 1996–2000 (1964).
  • 2.Hasegawa M. Photopolymerization of diolefin crystals. Chem. Rev. 1983;83:507–518. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lauher JW, Fowler FW, Goroff NS. Single-crystal-to-single-crystal topochemical polymerizations by design. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:1215–1229. doi: 10.1021/ar8001427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hema K, et al. Topochemical polymerizations for the solid-state synthesis of organic polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:4062–4099. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00840k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hema K, Ravi A, Raju C, Sureshan KM. Polymers with advanced structural and supramolecular features synthesized through topochemical polymerization. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:5361–5380. doi: 10.1039/d0sc07066a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu R, Schweizer WB, Frauenrath H. Soluble poly(diacetylene)s using the perfluorophenyl−phenyl motif as a supramolecular synthon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:11437–11445. doi: 10.1021/ja802964a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nakanishi, H. & Kasai, H. in Photonic and optoelectronic polymers Vol. 672 Acs symposium series Ch. 13, 183–198 (American Chemical Society, 1997).
  • 8.Dou L, et al. Single-crystal linear polymers through visible light–triggered topochemical quantitative polymerization. Science. 2014;343:272–277. doi: 10.1126/science.1245875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nomura S, et al. Crystal structures and topochemical polymerizations of 7,7,8,8-tetrakis(alkoxycarbonyl)quinodimethanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:2035–2041. doi: 10.1021/ja0386086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garai M, Santra R, Biradha K. Tunable plastic films of a crystalline polymer by single-crystal-to-single-crystal photopolymerization of a diene: Self-templating and shock-absorbing two-dimensional hydrogen-bonding layers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:5548–5551. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Coates GW, et al. Phenyl−perfluorophenyl stacking interactions: Topochemical [2+2] photodimerization and photopolymerization of olefinic compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:3641–3649. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Johnston P, Braybrook C, Saito K. Topochemical photo-reversible polymerization of a bioinspired monomer and its recovery and repolymerization after photo-depolymerization. Chem. Sci. 2012;3:2301–2306. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo Q-H, et al. Single-crystal polycationic polymers obtained by single-crystal-to-single-crystal photopolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:6180–6187. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li M, Schlüter AD, Sakamoto J. Solid-state photopolymerization of a shape-persistent macrocycle with two 1,8-diazaanthracene units in a single crystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:11721–11725. doi: 10.1021/ja3038905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Al-Kaysi RO, et al. Photopolymerization of organic molecular crystal nanorods. Macromolecules. 2007;40:9040–9044. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Servalli M, Trapp N, Schlüter AD. Single-crystal-to-single-crystal (scsc) linear polymerization of a desymmetrized anthraphane. Chem. Eur. J. 2018;24:15003–15012. doi: 10.1002/chem.201802513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khorasani S, Fernandes MA. A synthetic co-crystal prepared by cooperative single-crystal-to-single-crystal solid-state diels–alder reaction. Chem. Commun. 2017;53:4969–4972. doi: 10.1039/c6cc07628a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pathigoolla A, Gonnade RG, Sureshan KM. Topochemical click reaction: spontaneous self-stitching of a monosaccharide to linear oligomers through lattice-controlled azide–alkyne cycloaddition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:4362–4366. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hema K, Sureshan KM. Β-sheet to helical-sheet evolution induced by topochemical polymerization: Cross-α-amyloid-like packing in a pseudoprotein with gly-phe-gly repeats. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:8854–8859. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Krishnan BP, Rai R, Asokan A, Sureshan KM. Crystal-to-crystal synthesis of triazole-linked pseudo-proteins via topochemical azide–alkyne cycloaddition reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:14824–14827. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b07538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mohanrao R, Hema K, Sureshan KM. Topochemical synthesis of different polymorphs of polymers as a paradigm for tuning properties of polymers. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:865. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14733-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Khazeber, R. & Sureshan, K. M. Topochemical ene–azide cycloaddition reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 24875–24881 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Tian S, et al. Polydiacetylene-based ultrastrong bioorthogonal raman probes for targeted live-cell raman imaging. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:81. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13784-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hädicke E, Mez EC, Krauch CH, Wegner G, Kaiser J. The structure of polymeric 2,4-hexadiynylene-bis(phenylurethane) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1971;10:266–267. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jordan RobertS, et al. Synthesis of graphene nanoribbons via the topochemical polymerization and subsequent aromatization of a diacetylene precursor. Chem. 2016;1:78–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xiao J, Yang M, Lauher JW, Fowler FW. A supramolecular solution to a long-standing problem: The 1,6-polymerization of a triacetylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000;39:2132–2135. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20000616)39:12<2132::aid-anie2132>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Freitag M, et al. Polymerization studies of diiodohexatriyne and diiodooctatetrayne cocrystals. Macromolecules. 2019;52:8563–8568. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu R, Schweizer WB, Frauenrath H. Perfluorophenyl–phenyl interactions in the crystallization and topochemical polymerization of triacetylene monomers. Chem. Eur. J. 2009;15:9105–9116. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Matsumoto A, Matsumura T, Aoki S. Stereospecific polymerization of dialkyl muconates through free radical polymerization: Isotropic polymerization and topochemical polymerization. Macromolecules. 1996;29:423–432. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nagahama S, Matsumoto A. Synchronized propagation mechanism for crystalline-state polymerization of p-xylylenediammonium disorbate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:12176–12181. doi: 10.1021/ja011575e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tanaka T, Matsumoto A. First disyndiotactic polymer from a 1,4-disubstituted butadiene by alternate molecular stacking in the crystalline state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:9676–9677. doi: 10.1021/ja020615r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hou X, et al. Synthesis of polymeric ladders by topochemical polymerization. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:1218–1220. doi: 10.1039/c3cc47379a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoang T, Lauher JW, Fowler FW. The topochemical 1,6-polymerization of a triene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:10656–10657. doi: 10.1021/ja027444a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Itoh T, et al. Topochemical polymerization of 7,7,8,8-tetrakis(methoxycarbonyl)quinodimethane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41:4306–4309. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021115)41:22<4306::AID-ANIE4306>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Itoh T, et al. Molecular oxygen insertion polymerization into crystals of tetrakis(alkoxycarbonyl)quinodimethanes. Macromolecules. 2004;37:8230–8238. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Itoh T, et al. Solid-state polymerizations of 7-alkoxycarbonyl-7-cyano-1,4-benzoquinone methides. Macromolecules. 2004;37:7938–7944. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Itoh T, et al. Solid-state polymerization of 7,7,8,8-tetrakis(methoxyethoxycarbonyl)quinodimethane under uv irradiation. Macromolecules. 2009;42:6473–6482. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Itoh T, et al. Cis-specific topochemical polymerization: Alternating copolymerization of 7,7,8,8-tetrakis(methoxycarbonyl)quinodimethane with 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane in the solid state. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:2253–2256. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Itoh T, et al. Halogen bond effect for single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation: Topochemical polymerization of substituted quinodimethane. Macromolecules. 2015;48:5450–5455. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Itoh T, et al. Twofold helical polymerization: Thermal solid-state polymerization of 7-cyano-7-(2′-haloethoxycarbonyl)-1,4-benzoquinone methides. Macromolecules. 2015;48:2935–2947. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Itoh T, et al. Formation of bundle assemblies of stereoregular polymers in thermal solid-state polymerization of 7,7,8,8-tetrakis(aryloxycarbonyl)-p-quinodimethanes. Macromolecules. 2016;49:4802–4816. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Samanta R, Ghosh S, Devarapalli R, Reddy CM. Visible light mediated photopolymerization in single crystals: Photomechanical bending and thermomechanical unbending. Chem. Mater. 2018;30:577–581. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Samanta R, et al. Mechanical actuation and patterning of rewritable crystalline monomer−polymer heterostructures via topochemical polymerization in a dual-responsive photochromic organic material. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:16856–16863. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b23189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hsu T-J, Fowler FW, Lauher JW. Preparation and structure of a tubular addition polymer: a true synthetic nanotube. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:142–145. doi: 10.1021/ja209792f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lange RZ, Hofer G, Weber T, Schlüter AD. A two-dimensional polymer synthesized through topochemical [2 + 2]-cycloaddition on the multigram scale. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:2053–2059. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kissel P, Murray DJ, Wulftange WJ, Catalano VJ, King BT. A nanoporous two-dimensional polymer by single-crystal-to-single-crystal photopolymerization. Nat. Chem. 2014;6:774–778. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kissel P, et al. A two-dimensional polymer prepared by organic synthesis. Nat. Chem. 2012;4:287–291. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kory MJ, et al. Gram-scale synthesis of two-dimensional polymer crystals and their structure analysis by x-ray diffraction. Nat. Chem. 2014;6:779–784. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hu F, et al. Highly efficient preparation of single-layer two-dimensional polymer obtained from single-crystal to single-crystal synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:5636–5642. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c00907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Z, et al. Stereoregular two-dimensional polymers constructed by topochemical polymerization. Macromolecules. 2015;48:2894–2900. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bhola R, et al. A two-dimensional polymer from the anthracene dimer and triptycene motifs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:14134–14141. doi: 10.1021/ja404351p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Beaudoin D, Maris T, Wuest JD. Constructing monocrystalline covalent organic networks by polymerization. Nat. Chem. 2013;5:830–834. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sun A, Lauher JW, Goroff NS. Preparation of poly(diiododiacetylene), an ordered conjugated polymer of carbon and iodine. Science. 2006;312:1030. doi: 10.1126/science.1124621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Carmean RN, et al. Ultrahigh molecular weight hydrophobic acrylic and styrenic polymers through organic-phase photoiniferter-mediated polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2020;9:613–618. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Carmean RN, Becker TE, Sims MB, Sumerlin BS. Ultra-high molecular weights via aqueous reversible-deactivation radical polymerization. Chem. 2017;2:93–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Percec V, et al. Ultrafast synthesis of ultrahigh molar mass polymers by metal-catalyzed living radical polymerization of acrylates, methacrylates, and vinyl chloride mediated by set at 25 °C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:14156–14165. doi: 10.1021/ja065484z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xu J, Jung K, Atme A, Shanmugam S, Boyer C. A robust and versatile photoinduced living polymerization of conjugated and unconjugated monomers and its oxygen tolerance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:5508–5519. doi: 10.1021/ja501745g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Itoh T, Iwasaki T, Kubo M, Iwatsuki S. Polymerizations of nitrogen-containing heterophanes by vapor deposition method, transformation to polymeric films bearing a conjugated structure, and their properties. Polym. Bull. 1995;35:307–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Errede L, Hoyt JM. The chemistry of xylylenes. Iii. Some reactions of p-xylylene that occur by free radical intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960;82:436–439. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Anderson C, et al. A highly substituted pyrazinophane generated from a quinoidal system via a cascade reaction. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:4472–4475. doi: 10.1039/d0cc00916d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Anderson CL, et al. Electronic tuning of mixed quinoidal-aromatic conjugated polyelectrolytes: Direct ionic substitution on polymer main-chains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:17978–17985. doi: 10.1002/anie.201908609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu X, et al. Para-azaquinodimethane: A compact quinodimethane variant as an ambient stable building block for high-performance low band gap polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:8355–8363. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jones CG, et al. The cryoem method microed as a powerful tool for small molecule structure determination. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018;4:1587–1592. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dadobayev G, Slutsker AI. Temperature dependence of expansion of crystalline lattices of some flexible chain polymers. Polym. Sci. U. S. S. R. 1982;24:1837–1844. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ishige R, et al. Precise analysis of thermal volume expansion of crystal lattice for fully aromatic crystalline polyimides by x-ray diffraction method: Relationship between molecular structure and linear/volumetric thermal expansion. Macromolecules. 2017;50:2112–2123. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhu L, Wang Q. Novel ferroelectric polymers for high energy density and low loss dielectrics. Macromolecules. 2012;45:2937–2954. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhang Z, Wang DH, Litt MH, Tan L-S, Zhu L. High-temperature and high-energy-density dipolar glass polymers based on sulfonylated poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:1528–1531. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gruene T, Holstein JJ, Clever GH, Keppler B. Establishing electron diffraction in chemical crystallography. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021;5:660–668. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00302-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gruene T, Mugnaioli E. 3d electron diffraction for chemical analysis: Instrumentation developments and innovative applications. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:11823–11834. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (49.7MB, pdf)
41467_2021_27090_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (76.1KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (17.1MB, mp4)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The crystallographic data of monomers 1–4 and P2 generated in this study have been deposited to Cambridge Structural Database under accession code 2102275, 2102276, 2102277, 2102278, and 2102279, respectively.

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES