Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 24;11:22814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02329-5

Table 2.

Relative feature importance.

Regulariser (λ) OpA Opα min VS Gradα FD AUC (95% CI)
Lasso (λmin) 487 360 356 – – 0.67 (0.66 to 0.68)
Lasso (λ1SE) 443 174 212 – –
Elastic-net (λmin) 451 371 382 – – 0.67 (0.66 to 0.68)
Elastic-net (λ1SE) 451 118 235 – –
Lasso (λmin) 441 402 451 488 – 0.73 (0.73 to 0.74)
Lasso (λ1SE) 315 190 272 450 –
Elastic-net (λmin) 463 438 455 491 – 0.73 (0.73 to 0.74)
Elastic-net (λ1SE) 362 243 283 451 –
Lasso (λmin) 385 377 445 441 487 0.76 (0.75 to 0.76)
Lasso (λ1SE) 202 187 316 439 259
Elastic-net (λmin) 407 411 466 455 494 0.76 (0.75 to 0.77)
Elastic-net (λ1SE) 253 220 261 335 460
Orlando et al. 13 (Lasso) – – – – √ 0.67 (0.52 to 0.80)

Relative feature importance calculated by the number of times a feature reached a non-zero coefficient per bootstrap, average bootstrap performances and performances reported in 13 using fractal dimensions to detect PDR. Bold indicates the most important feature.

CI confidence intervals, AUC area under curve.