Table 5:
Bivariate Logistic Regressions for Men’s Current MC Use and Future FP Use (N=885)
| Current MC | Future FP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | |
| Village | 1.43 | 0.74, 2.75 | 0.55 | 0.34, 0.87 |
| Men’s Village Factors for FP | ||||
| Network Size | 0.61 | 0.37, 1.02 | 1.50 | 1.01, 2.21 |
| Network Outside of Village | 0.99 | 0.96, 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.00, 1.04 |
| Network Non-Relative | 1.01 | 0.98, 1.04 | 1.01 | 0.99, 1.04 |
| Network FP Approval | 0.98 | 0.96, 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.01, 1.04 |
| Network FP Communication | 1.05 | 1.01, 1.09 | 0.97 | 0.94, 0.99 |
| FP Acceptability | 1.01 | 0.97, 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.01, 1.06 |
| Disagree that FP Sanctions exist | 1.23 | 0.84, 1.82 | 0.68 | 0.52, 0.88 |
| Men’s Couple & Individual Factors for FP | ||||
| At least one wife approves of FP | 3.89 | 2.48, 6.10 | 15.14 | 10.23, 22.40 |
| Wife in Network | 1.61 | 1.05, 2.46 | 1.73 | 1.23, 2.43 |
| Couple Communication about FP | 2.10 | 1.77, 2.49 | 3.07 | 2.52, 3.74 |
| Self-Efficacy to Discuss FP | 1.44 | 1.20, 1.72 | 2.79 | 2.37, 3.29 |
| Self-Efficacy to Use FP | 3.81 | 2.49, 5.84 | 6.30 | 4.57, 8.69 |
| FP Access | 3.24 | 2.49, 4.20 | 3.02 | 2.55, 3.57 |
| Covariates | ||||
| Age Group (>34 ref) | ||||
| 18-34 | 0.66 | 0.46, 0.94 | 1.39 | 1.04, 1.85 |
| Education (None ref) | ||||
| Primary | 1.61 | 1.04, 2.48 | 1.83 | 1.30, 2.57 |
| Secondary or more | 2.11 | 1.33, 3.34 | 2.52 | 1.72, 3.69 |
| Number of Living Children (5 or more ref) | ||||
| None or 1 | 0.27 | 0.14, 0.51 | 1.31 | 0.85, 2.00 |
| 2-4 | 0.68 | 0.48, 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.70, 1,28 |
| Multiple Wives | 1.50 | 1.05, 2.15 | 1.25 | 0.92, 1.69 |
| Non-Christian Religion | 0.96 | 0.62, 1.50 | 0.54 | 0.37, 0.79 |