Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 10;11(11):3213. doi: 10.3390/ani11113213

Table 7.

Effect of dietary perilla cake supplementation on the fatty acid profile in the abdominal fat of growing pigs.

Fatty Acid (g/100g Fat) Formula PC0 PC5 PC10 SEM p-Value
Saturated fatty acid
Miristic acid C14:0 1.58 1.78 1.64 0.039 0.103
Palmitic acid C16:0 17.12 18.53 14.47 0.351 0.248
Heptadecanoic acid C17:0 0.36 1.27 0.15 0.425 0.546
Stearic acid C18:0 14.13 16.44 14.77 0.462 0.104
Arachidic acid C20:0 0.22 0.21 0.10 0.027 0.124
Heneicosylic acid C21:0 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.008 0.411
Behenic acid C22:0 0.16 0.21 0.51 0.077 0.130
Tricosylic acid C23:0 1.52 1.81 1.62 0.117 0.621
Monounsaturated fatty acid
Palmitoleic acid C16:1 (cis-9) 4.76 4.43 4.69 0.193 0.788
Heptadecanoic acid C17:1 0.99 nd 0.05 0.312 0.362
Oleic acid C18:1 (cis-9) 36.42 36.64 37.07 0.487 0.870
Gondoic acid C20:1 1.46 0.66 1.03 0.181 0.197
Polyunsaturated fatty acid
Linoleic acid C18:2 (cis-9,12) 10.57 10.04 13.19 0.954 0.344
Eicosadienoic acid C20:2 (cis-11,14) 4.19 0.84 0.82 0.997 0.272
γ-linolenic acid C18:3 (cis-6,9,12) 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.012 0.880
α-linolenic acid C18:3 (cis-9,12,15) 1.49 b 3.74 a 3.90a 0.458 0.046
Eicosatrienoic acid C20:3 2.17 2.33 2.38 0.133 0.825
Eicosapentaenoic acid C20:5 0.61 0.73 0.35 0.072 0.078
Docosahexaenoic acid C22:6 0.20 0.25 0.15 0.062 0.797
ΣSFA 42.42 a 38.58 ab 36.34 b 1.058 0.034
ΣMUFA 43.64 41.74 42.85 0.689 0.549
ΣPUFA 13.93 19.69 20.81 1.292 0.059

Different superscripts (a and b) in the same row indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05). PC0, control; PC5, 5% perilla cake supplementation; PC10, 10% perilla cake supplementation; SEM, standard error of mean; nd, not detected lower than the limit of detection (0.01 µg/mL); SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.