Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;11(11):3060. doi: 10.3390/ani11113060

Table 4.

Texture profile analysis (TPA) of three salami (SR, S50, and S75) during ripening.

Day 30 60 120
M ± sE M ± sE M ± sE
Hardness SR 31.13 ± 1.50 X,A 35.07 ± 2.76 x,A 70.05 ± 3.30 X,B
S50 30.30 ± 1.24 X,A 32.16 ± 2.09 A 62.43 ± 2.62 X,B
S75 21.13 ± 1.05 Y,A 29.29 ± 0.90 y,B 44.31 ± 2.62 Y,C
Cohesiveness SR 0.46 ± 0.03 0.45 ± 0.02 X 0.45 ± 0.02 x
S50 0.47 ± 0.02 0.50 ± 0.02 0.47 ± 0.01
S75 0.54 ± 0.10 0.54 ± 0.01 Y,A 0.43 ± 0.01 y,B
Springiness SR 0.97 ± 0.04 A 0.90 ± 0.01 X,A 0.86 ± 0.01 x,B
S50 1.03 ± 0.05 A 0.84 ± 0.02 Y,B 0.93 ± 0.02 y,A
S75 1.01 ± 0.06 a 0.87 ± 0.02 b 0.90 ± 0.02 y
Gumminess SR 14.19 ± 0.92 A 16.13 ± 1.76 A 31.49 ± 1.94 X,B
S50 14.20 ± 1.00 A 15.82 ± 0.95 A 29.14 ± 1.66 X,B
S75 11.33 ± 2.02 a,A 15.75 ± 0.65 b,A 19.23 ± 1.50 Y,B
Chewiness SR 13.60 ± 0.73 A 14.45 ± 1.58 A 26.98 ± 1.66 X,B
S50 14.36 ± 0.86 A 13.22 ± 0.73 A 26.77 ± 1.38 X,B
S75 11.15 ± 1.80 A 13.77 ± 0.62 a 17.36 ± 1.43 Y,b,B
Adhesiveness SR −2.03 ± 0.57 X,A −3.38 ± 0.72 x,A −10.18 ± 2.12 X,B
S50 −6.44 ± 1.26 Y,A −1.75 ± 0.46 B −18.01 ± 1.47 Y,C
S75 −4.35 ± 1.12 a,A −1.74 ± 0.35 y,b,A −12.09 ± 2.61 B
Resilience SR 0.29 ± 0.08 0.23 ± 0.03 0.18 ± 0.05
S50 0.39 ± 0.11 a 0.17 ± 0.03 b 0.17 ± 0.04
S75 0.36 ± 0.11 0.17 ± 0.02 0.28 ± 0.10

In each sampling day, three samples by type of salami were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed comparing experimental groups at each sampling time and within each experimental group along the ripening period. All data were presented as the least square mean (M) ± standard error (sE). Different superscript uppercase letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.01. Different superscript lowercase letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. a–c Mean values in the same row (same batch in different weeks) with different letters presented significant differences. x–y Mean values in the same column (different samples on the same ripening time) with different letters presented significant differences.