TABLE 2.
Interscorer Reliability of R-PAS Scoring
| Variable | M_blind scorera | SD_blind scorer | M_authorsb | SD_authors | ICCc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 18.70 | 6.18 | 18.80 | 6.24 | 0.997 |
| Complexity | 61.30 | 32.91 | 61.65 | 32.19 | 0.991 |
| CF + C | 1.60 | 1.76 | 2.60 | 2.54 | 0.781 |
| EII-3 | 0.86 | 1.51 | 0.92 | 1.65 | 0.960 |
| SevCog | 1.95 | 3.71 | 1.80 | 2.84 | 0.864 |
| FQ−% | 12.00 | 9.60 | 15.75 | 11.14 | 0.772 |
| MAP | 3.40 | 2.82 | 2.85 | 3.38 | 0.776 |
| PHR | 4.45 | 4.10 | 4.35 | 3.38 | 0.882 |
| CritCont% | 44.60 | 26.49 | 45.50 | 30.69 | 0.953 |
N = 20 for all.
aThe blind scorer was a certified R-PAS examiner, an experienced R-PAS scorer, and teacher of the R-PAS.
bThe authors were also experienced in using and scoring the Rorschach/R-PAS.
cSingle-measure ICC. ICCs 0.745 and greater are regarded as excellent (Cichetti, 1994). We used absolute agreement and the two-way random effects model.