Table 1.
Author/Year | Study Design | Analytical Method | Discriminant VOCs | Calssification Performance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Friedman et al. (1994) [82] | 24 CLD 24 Controls |
GC-MS | Hydrogen-sulphide ↑ Limonene ↑ |
n/a |
Sehnert et al. (2002) [83] | 86 CLD 109 Controls |
GC | Carbonyl sulphide ↑ | n/a |
Van den Velde et al. (2008) [84] | 52 CLD 50 Controls |
GC-MS | Acetone ↑ Dimethyl-sulphide ↑ 2-butanone ↑ 2-pentanone ↑ Indole ↓ Dimethyl-selenide ↓ |
100% sensitivity 70% specificity |
Dadamio et al. (2012) [85] | 35 CLD 49 Controls |
GC-MS | Dimethyl-sulphide ↑ Acetone ↑ 2-butanone ↑ 2-pentanone ↑ Indole ↓ Phenol ↓ Dimethyl-selenide ↓ Isoprene ↑ Ethane ↑ Pentane ↑ |
83% sensitivity 100% specificity |
Pijls et al. (2016) [86] | 34 cirrhotic 87 non-cirrhotic 31 controls |
GC-MS | Dimethyl-sulphide ↑ Terpene (limonene) ↑ 2-methyl-butanal ↓ Propanoic acid ↑ Octane ↑ Terpenoid ↑ 3-carene ↑ 1-hexadecanol ↓ C16H34 ↓ |
83% sensitivity 87% specificity |
Morisco et al. (2013) [87] | 12 CLD 14 Controls |
PTR-MS |
Heptadienol ↑ Methanol ↑ 2-butanone ↑ 3-pentone ↑ 2-octanone ↑ 2-nonanone ↑ Monoterpene ↑ P-cymene ↑ |
83% sensitivity 86% specificity |
Fernandez Del Rio et al. (2015) [88] | 31 CLD 30 Controls |
PTR-MS | Methanol ↑ 2-butanone ↑ Carbon-sulphide ↑ 2-pentanone ↑ Limonene ↑ |
97% sensitivity 70% specificity |
Sinha et al. (2020) [89] | 15 chirrosis NAFLD 14 non-cirrhosis NAFLD 14 Controls |
GC-MS |
Styrene Acetone Isoprene DMS D-limonene Acetophenone Terpinene |
Cirrhotic vs. Control: AUCs = 0.98 Cirrhotic vs. Non-cirrhotic: AUC = 0.91 Non-Cirrhotic vs. Control: AUC = 0.84 |
Ferrandino et al. [90] | 44 cirrhosis 42 controls |
GC-MS | Limonene | AUC = 0.78 |