Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 9;13(22):5601. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225601

Table 1.

Associations between immune microenvironment and molecular features/prognosis in pediatric brain tumors.

Entity Immunological Profile/Immune Population Associated Molecular Features Prognosis Sample Cohort Study
pLGG, pHGG Hot (IS-I): more pLGGs, no DIPGs. BRAF mutation (69.6%) MS 1: 29.8y/>18y 384 from CBTTC/111 from ICGC [61]
Altered (IS-II): transitional stage. SVIL mutation (55.5%) MS 1: 19.2y/13.3y
Cold (IS-III): large fractions of pHGGs, DIPGs. CACNA1A mutation (74.2%) MS 1: 14.5y/1.99y
Monocytic lineage expression ↑ Improved OS 2 113 [62]
pHGG Monocytes ↑ MAPK mutation 143 [21]
NK cells ↑ G34/WT-C Poor OS 2: 3.0
B cells ↓ WT-A Poor OS 2: 4.3
CD8 T cells ↑ hypermutator tumors (MMRD 4; POLE/POLD1 mutations); BRAFV600E or NF1 113 [67]
Gr.4-MB Monocytes ↑ 408 [21]
SHH-MB 3 Tregs ↑ Poor OS 2: HR 1.7
Gr.3-MB CD8 T cells ↑; B cells ↑; Tregs ↓ MYC amplification Poor OS 2: HR 3.3
SHH-MB AIF1 expression (MAC/MG 5) ↑ Improved OS 2 172 [66]
B cells ↑ Improved OS 2 35 [21]
ATRT CD68+ MAC/MG 5 Poor OS 2: HR 11.9 34 [18]
CD4/8 T cells ↑ PBRM1 ↑ Improved OS 2 33 [68]
CD163+ macrophages ↑ PBRM1 ↑ Poor OS 2

1 Median survival; 2 overall survival; 3 infant; 4 mismatch repair deficiency; 5 macrophages/microglia. ↑: High cell number/expression, ↓: Low cell number/expression