Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):1493. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111493

Table 3.

Difference for the outcome measures between the three periods.

Variables Intervention Group (n = 11) Control Group (n = 11)
Difference
[95% CI]
p Value Effect Size Observed Power Difference
[95% CI]
p Value Effect Size Observed Power
TUG test (s)
Post–Pre −1.95 ± 0.660
(−3.42, −0.473)
0.015 a −0.888 0.977 0.34 ± 0.26
(−0.25, −0.92)
0.227 0.388 0.411
Follow-up–Pre −2.24 ± 0.77
(−3.97, −0.52)
0.016 b −0.875 0.974 −0.04 ± 0.39
(−0.92, 0.83)
0.912 −0.034 0.052
Follow-up–Post −0.30 ± 0.52
(−1.45, 0.86)
0.855 −0.173 0.121 −0.38 ± 0.36
(−1.19, 0.42)
0.313 −0.320 0.299
mGES (points)
Post–Pre 6.36 ± 6.25
(−7.57, 20.30)
0.330 0.307 0.279 0.00 ± 3.85
(−8.57, 8.57)
1.000 −0.591 0.752
Follow-up–Pre 10.55 ± 4.36
(0.84, 20.26)
0.036 b 0.730 0.903 −7.46 ± 3.16
(−14.48, −0.43)
0.040 b −1.365 0.999
Follow-up–Post 4.18 ± 6.35
(−9.96, 18.32)
0.525 0.199 0.144 −7.46 ± 3.14
(−14.45, −0.46)
0.039 c −1.369 0.999

TUG, timed up and go test; mGES, modified gait efficacy scale. a Significant difference between pre- and post-intervention (p < 0.05). b Significant difference between follow-up and pre-intervention (p < 0.05). c Significant difference between follow-up and post-intervention (p < 0.05).