Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 21;11(11):1559. doi: 10.3390/biom11111559

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Comparisons of various LA mechanical parameters between subjects with AF (n = 25) and those without AF (n = 224). (B) Odds ratios for the different LA mechanical parameters that were used for identifying AF. The baseline model for each LA parameter as a predictor was transformed into a standardized z-score and was separately examined. All parameters were subjected to a uniform adjustment for daily drinking dose and presence of ALDH2 polymorphism (binary variable) (lower panel). Multivariate models were further subjected to adjustment for CHARGE-AF scores (upper panel). PR (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.72–1.69, p = 0.65), LAVi (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.95–2.27, p = 0.086), and LAEF (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.72–1.88, p = 0.54) were non-significant predictors prior to the adjustment for CHARGE-AF. * denotes p < 0.05 in the models.