Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 13;13(22):5683. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225683

Table 5.

Dose-volume metrics for CLIN compared with iCE and iCE_noBAO plans. Median value and interquartile range (IQR) is given, along with p-values for difference with regard to CLIN. Significant differences from CLIN are marked with *.

Dose Metric CLIN iCE iCE_noBAO
Median IQR Median IQR p Median IQR p
PTV V95% [%] 99.0 0.9 99.2 0.5 0.1 99.3 0.5 0.2
Lungs Dmean [Gy] 14.7 4.2 14.2 4.7 0.3 14.6 4.4 0.4
Lungs V5Gy [%] 55.8 11.7 54.7 10.9 0.6 57.4 12.7 0.1
Lungs V20Gy [%] 25.0 6.7 24.4 7.9 0.5 24.3 7.0 0.2
Heart Dmean [Gy] 9.0 7.1 8.1 5.9 0.02 * 8.3 6.7 0.07
Heart V5Gy [%] 34.0 33.1 31.8 30.9 0.7 33.2 31.6 0.9
Heart V30Gy [%] 11.0 9.5 6.2 6.5 0.002 * 8.8 8.4 0.002 *
Esophagus Dmean [Gy] 20.3 8.2 18.5 9.2 0.02 * 18.9 9.1 0.05 *
Esophagus V20Gy [%] 38.4 14.3 36.8 17.7 0.008 * 35.4 16.4 0.08
Esophagus V60Gy [%] 5.1 14.3 4.9 12.8 1.0 4.7 13.2 0.05 * 1

1 Although the median value is lower, this parameter was significantly increased with iCE_noBAO compared to CLIN (the value was higher in iCE_noBAO for 16 patients, higher in CLIN for 9 patients and equal for 1 patient).