Table 1.
Dataset | Country | Nutritional status | N | Rho | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desai et al.27 | Malawi | All | 41 | 0.29 | 0.0636 |
Stunted | 15 | 0.50 | 0.0580 | ||
Nonstunted | 26 | 0.21 | 0.3126 | ||
Dinh et al.28 | India | All | 19 | 0.62 | 0.0051 |
Stunted | 8 | −0.40 | 0.3268 | ||
Nonstunted | 9 | 0.52 | 0.1618 | ||
Rouhani et al.11 | Peru | All | 168 | 0.06 | 0.4582 |
Stunted | 69 | 0.25 | 0.0415 | ||
Nonstunted | 99 | −0.05 | 0.6384 | ||
Vonaesch et al.12,26 | Madagascar | All | 180 | 0.26 | 0.0005 |
Stunted | 92 | 0.30 | 0.0042 | ||
Nonstunted | 88 | 0.19 | 0.0780 | ||
Vonaesch et al.12,26 | CAR | All | 134 | 0.20 | 0.0184 |
Stunted | 60 | 0.30 | 0.0191 | ||
Nonstunted | 74 | 0.10 | 0.3606 | ||
Meta-analysis | All | All | 547 | 0.29 | 4.6e-12 |
Stunted | 243 | 0.39 | 1.6e-10 | ||
Nonstunted | 299 | 0.19 | 0.0009 |
Bold values indicate statistical significance p < 0.05.
Children were defined as either stunted (height-for-age z-score ≤ −2) or nonstunted (height-for-age z-score > −2) for the analyses reported in this table.