Table 1.
A summary of QTL studies used for MQTL analysis (Details are provided in Supplementary Table S1).
| No. of mapping populations (range of population size; no. of studies*) | Parameters | No. of pathotypes used | Methods of QTL analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. RIL populations | |||
| 59 (92–288; 56) | AUDPC, IT, DS, SR, NDVI, LP, RT | 58 | ICIM, CIM, SMA, LOCO-LMM, MIM |
| II. DH populations | |||
| 18 (78–1020; 14) | IT, DS, SR, IR, AUDPC, RT, NDVI, LAI | 22 | ICIM, CIM |
| III. F3 populations | |||
| 7 (136–326; 7) | IT, AUDPC, DS, SN | 18 | ICIM, SIM, CIM |
RIL recombinant inbred line, DH doubled haploid, AUDPC area under disease progress curve, IT infection type, DS disease severity, SR stripe rust response, NDVI normalized difference vegetation index, LP latency period, RT reaction type, IR infection response, LAI leaf area infected, SN number of stripes per 10 cm2 leaf area, ICIM inclusive composite interval mapping, CIM composite interval mapping, SMA single marker analysis, LOCO-LMM leave one chromosome out-linear mixed model, MIM multiple interval mapping, SIM simple interval mapping.
*In one of the studies, two different populations, i.e. RIL and DH, both are used. Therefore, this study is counted two times, i.e., in I and II.