Table 1.
Site | Phase | Dates | Sample size | Unadjusted GCs | Adjusted GCs |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Ban Kao | Neolithic | 2000–1250 BC | 27 | 0.340 | 0.310 |
Khok Charoen | Neolithic | 1500–1150 BC | 22 | 0.477 | 0.435 |
Khok Phanom Di | Neolithic | 2000–1600 BC | 53 | 0.363 | 0.329 |
Ban Non Wat | Neolithic 1 | 1800–1250 BC | 14 | 0.524 | 0.478 |
Ban Non Wat | Neolithic 2 | 1250–1050 BC | 26 | 0.532 | 0.484 |
Ban Non Wat/Ban Lum Khao | BA2 | 900–800 BC | 43 | 0.724 | 0.657 |
Ban Non Wat | BA 3 | 900–800 BC | 25 | 0.596 | 0.542 |
Ban Non Wat | BA 4 | 800–700 BC | 87 | 0.663 | 0.603 |
Ban Non Wat | BA 5 | 700–420 BC | 25 | 0.383 | 0.350 |
Nong Nor | BA | 700–420 BC | 42 | 0.562 | 0.510 |
Non Nok Tha | BA | 1000–500 BC | 37 | 0.526 | 0.478 |
Ban Non Wat | IA | 420–100 BC | 70 | 0.477 | 0.433 |
Noen U-Loke | IA 3 | 200–400 AD | 13 | 0.612 | 0.557 |
Noen U-Loke | IA 4 | 300–500 AD | 12 | 0.668 | 0.608 |
Non Ban Jak | IA | 300–600 AD | 44 | 0.526 | 0.477 |
The estimates in column (5) and (6) show, respectively, the GC computed before and after the adjustment procedure explained in the text.