Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 18;9(11):313. doi: 10.3390/toxics9110313

Table 2.

Comparison of synthesis methods on the properties of carbon-based TiO2 nanocomposites and the removal efficiency of antibiotics.

S. No. Composite Material Synthesis Method Used BET Surface Area (m2/g) Pore Volume (cc/g) Targeted Antibiotic Mechanism of Removal Removal Efficiency References
1 AC/TiO2 Sol–gel 129 0.30 Tetracycline Photocatalysis ~97% [102]
2 BC/Zn/TiO2 Solvothermal 435 - acetaminophen Photocatalysis 92% [103]
3 BC-BiOCl One step hydrolysis 3,546 0.011 Tetracycline Photocatalysis 60.3% [104]
4 BC-TiO2 Ultrasound promoted wet impregnation 399 - Phenol Photocatalysis 64.1% (UV light)
55667733.6% (Visible light)
[78]
5 Magnetic BC/TiO2 Solvothermal - - Sulfadiazine Photocatalysis ~88% [105]
6 TiO2/rGO Hydrothermal 48.09 - Sulfamethoxazole Photocatalysis ~90% [106]
7 rGO/TiO2/Na Alginate Hydrothermal - - Azithromycin Photocatalysis ~99% [81]
8 Bi/Bi2O3/BC Thermal method 338.2 0.161 Estrone Photocatalysis ~90% [107]
9 BioBr/BC Solvothermal - - Ciprofloxacin Photocatalysis 96.8% [108]
10 CuWO4/BC Hydrothermal 6.8104 - Ciprofloxacin Photocatalysis 97% [109]