Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;64(5):713–722. doi: 10.1159/000515283

Table 1.

Summary of the characteristics of the included studies

Author Study location Study design Eyes, n
Mean age, years
Gender (male/female)
Minimum diameter
Hole closure rate, %
Follow-up, months
ILM flap ILM peeling ILM flap ILM peeling ILM flap ILM peeling ILM flap ILM peeling ILM flap ILM peeling
Kannan et al. [14] India RCT 30 30 59.37 61.17 11/19 17/13 803.33 759.97 90 76.7 6
Iovino et al. [16] Italy RCT 20 20 71 69 9/11 7/13 666.95 664.6 100 100 6
Manasa et al. [11] India RCT 43 48 63.41 60.95 20/23 22/26 673 657.5 95.3 87.5 3
Velez-Montoya et al. [15] Mexico RCT 12 12 64.2 61.8 nr nr 608.89 522.22 91.67 91.67 3
Michalewska et al. [10] Poland RCT 50 51 66 65 13/33 8/32 759 698 98 88 12

RCT, randomized controlled trial; ILM, internal limiting membrane; nr, not reported.