Table 5.

Descriptive statistics for study variables in Study 2, by gender, care (having dependents or not), and work situation.

Variables		Gender		Care (Dependents)		Work Situation
	Total	Woman	Man	Yes	No	Telework	On-Site
	M (SD)	M (SD)	M (SD)	M (SD)	M (SD)	M (SD)	M (SD)
Socio-health situation
Fear of contagion	4.93 (1.52)	4.99 (1.51)	4.85 (1.53)	5.26 (1.45)	4.85 (1.53)	4.75 (1.42)	5.18 (1.61)
Perceived economic threat	4.65 (1.17)	4.72 (1.14)	4.55 (1.2)	4.9 (1.1)	4.59 (1.18)	4.54 (1.14)	4.8 (1.9)
New work organisation
Hours worked	2.04 (0.71)	2.09 (0.75)	1.95 (0.69)	2.14 (0.74)	2 (0.72)	2.07 (0.78)	1.98 (0.64)
Less	23.6%	23.6%	26.3%	19.6%	26.4%	25.5%	21.2%
Same	48.5%	43.8%	52.5%	47.1%	47.7%	40%	59.1%
More	27.9%	32.6%	21.2%	33.3%	25.9%	34.5%	19.7%
Resources provided for teleworking	3.83 (1.52)	3.72 (1.5)	4.05 (1.56)	3.65 (1.61)	3.88 (1.5)	3.84 (1.52)
Organisation’s readiness to telework	4.26 (1.6)	4.33 (1.53)	4.12 (1.73)	4.17 (1.65)	4.28 (1.59)	4.26 (1.6)
Safety in on-site work	3.99 (1.77)	4.1 (1.77)	3.88 (1.77)	3.55 (1.93)	4.1 (1.72)		3.99 (1.77)
Productivity control measures	32.7% YES	39.32% YES	28.57% YES	48.27% YES	31.25% YES	32.7% YES
Conciliation
Work-family conflict	3.49 (1.74)	3.63 (1.82)	3.27 (1.61)	4.18 (1.89)	3.31 (1.66)	3.63 (1.65)	3.29 (1.85)
Family-work conflict	2.59 (1.57)	2.73 (1.67)	2.4 (1.4)	3.3 (1.9)	2.42 (1.43)	3 (1.69)	2.06 (1.21)
Psychosocial consequences and coping
Negative workaholism	2.77 (1.1)	2.96 (1.11)	2.44 (1.05)	2.79 (1.23)	2.74 (1.09)	3.04 (1.12)	2.35 (.98)
Positive workaholism	3.77 (1.47)	3.91 (1.34)	3.58 (1.61)	3.66 (1.47)	3.8 (1.46)	4.18 (1.31)	3.22 (1.48)
Coping	5 (1.26)	5.31 (1.15)	4.65 (1.33)	5.04 (1.15)	5.05 (1.29)	5.13 (1.19)	4.93 (1.35)
Job stress	4.4 (1.46)	4.58 (1.44)	4.13 (1.45)	4.65 (1.75)	4.33 (1.37)	4.26 (1.42)	4.58 (1.48)