Table 6.
Associations of the biomarker-related and RRR-derived dietary pattern scores with type 2 diabetes among males and females 1.
| Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | p for Trend | Per 1 Score-SD | |
| Men | |||||||
| Diabetes/Control | 15/258 | 27/246 | 33/241 | 47/226 | 37/236 | ||
| Crude | 1 (reference) | 1.89 (0.98, 3.63) | 2.36 (1.25, 4.44) | 3.58 (1.95, 6.57) | 2.7 0(1.44, 5.04) | <0.0002 | 1.42 (1.20, 1.68) |
| Model 1 | 1 (reference) | 1.91 (0.97, 3.76) | 2.06 (1.00, 4.22) | 2.42 (1.07, 5.50) | 1.64 (0.72, 3.75) | 0.578 | 1.15 (0.89, 1.48) |
| Model 2 | 1 (reference) | 1.76 (0.89, 3.50) | 1.8 (0.86, 3.75) | 2.07 (0.90, 4.78) | 1.44 (0.61, 3.40) | 0.743 | 1.13 (0.86, 1.49) |
| Model 3 | 1 (reference) | 1.62 (0.81–3.22) | 1.46 (0.69–3.10) | 1.70 (0.72–4.01) | 1.21 (0.50, 2.89) | 0.962 | 1.07 (0.81, 1.42) |
| Women | |||||||
| Diabetes/Control | 37/427 | 38/426 | 36/429 | 36/430 | 44/420 | ||
| Crude | 1 (reference) | 1.03 (0.64, 1.65) | 0.97 (0.60, 1.56) | 0.91 (0.56, 1.48) | 1.21 (0.77, 1.91) | 0.592 | 1.08 (0.93, 1.25) |
| Model 1 | 1 (reference) | 1.24 (0.76, 2.05) | 1.63 (0.84, 3.14) | 1.46 (0.73, 2.92) | 1.69 (0.84, 3.39) | 0.229 | 1.35 (1.05, 1.73) |
| Model 2 | 1 (reference) | 1.16 (0.70, 1.94) | 1.39 (0.69, 2.79) | 1.20 (0.57, 2.52) | 1.40 (0.67, 2.93) | 0.522 | 1.29 (0.99, 1.68) |
| Model 3 | 1 (reference) | 1.11 (0.66, 1.86) | 1.32 (0.65, 2.67) | 1.20 (0.57, 2.57) | 1.42 (0.67, 3.02) | 0.422 | 1.30 (0.99, 1.71) |
1 Odds ratios (ORs) at 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by logistic regression, and the p-values for the trend were calculated by modeling the median of the dietary pattern scores as the independent variable, Q1 as quintile 1, etc. Model 1: adjusted for age (years) and study site (categorical); Model 2: Model 1 + education (4 categories), energy intake (kcal/day), smoking (yes or no), physical activity (METs-h/week); Model 3: Model 2+ BMI and waist circumference.