Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):1153. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111153

Table 1.

Relative advantages and disadvantages of clinically available imaging modalities for LVEF evaluation.

Imaging Modality Advantages Disadvantages
Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
  • Wide availability

  • High cost effectiveness

  • Real-time images

  • No ionizing radiation

  • Minimal tissue effects

  • Depends on acoustic window and operator experience

  • Depends on geometric assumptions

Contrast-TTE
  • Improved accuracy

  • Reduced inter- and intra-observer variability

  • Low reproducibility

  • Underestimation of volumes in apical fore-shortening

3D-TTE
  • No geometric assumption

  • Improved accuracy

  • Suboptimal spatial resolution

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR)
  • No geometric assumption

  • No ionizing radiation

  • High reproducibility

  • High spatial and temporal resolution

  • No contrast administration

  • High cost

  • Low availability and expertise

  • Non-MR conditional devices

Computed Tomography (CT)
  • High spatial resolution

  • Simultaneous coronary imaging

  • Ionizing radiation exposure

  • Low temporal resolution

  • Contrast administration

Nuclear Cardiology Imaging
  • Wide availability

  • Simultaneous perfusion imaging

  • High dose of radiation exposure

  • Low temporal resolution