Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 18;10(11):2860. doi: 10.3390/foods10112860

Table 4.

Consumer acceptability of the six buckwheat jellies (1).

Sample (2) p-Value (3)
BJ_265 BJ_153 BJ_870 BJ_453 BJ_335 BJ_916
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Color liking 4.60 1.49 4.81 1.46 4.62 1.41 4.89 1.49 4.95 1.43 5.04 1.57 0.381
Smell liking 4.60 1.83 4.51 1.62 4.53 1.51 4.55 1.49 4.44 1.79 4.89 1.74 0.658
Savory taste liking 4.99 1.84 4.67 1.62 4.60 1.50 4.63 1.46 4.89 1.80 5.19 1.71 0.203
Aftertaste liking 4.59 1.96 b 4.70 1.60 b 4.32 1.54 b 4.67 1.66 b 4.86 1.75 b 5.44 1.67 a 0.004
Harmony with the sauce 4.44 1.83 c 4.89 1.72 bc 4.63 1.73 c 5.26 1.67 ab 5.34 1.73 ab 5.70 1.66 a <0.001
Overall liking 4.15 1.82 c 4.42 1.63 cd 4.29 1.49 cd 4.82 1.53 bc 5.19 1.82 ab 5.72 1.65 a <0.001
Recommend 3.30 1.78 d 3.62 1.82 cd 3.58 1.79 cd 4.06 1.85 bc 4.37 2.11 ab 4.85 1.85 a <0.001
Try again 2.96 1.75 c 3.10 1.78 c 3.13 1.72 c 3.80 1.85 b 4.06 2.09 b 4.68 1.89 a <0.001

(1) Consumer acceptability test was conducted by 93 panelists using the nine-point hedonic scaling method (one point: dislike extremely, five points: moderate, nine points: like extremely). (2) Sample information: BJ 265 (0% mung bean powder), BJ 153 (5% mung bean powder), BJ_870 (10% mung bean powder), BJ_453 (15% mung bean powder), BJ_335 (20% mung bean powder) and BJ_916 (25% mung bean powder). (3) p-value by ANOVA. a–d Different superscript letters mean significantly different among groups at α = 0.05 level by Duncan’s multiple range test.