Table 3.
Author | Aim of the Study | Size of Groups | Vit D Dose (IU) and Duration of Treatment |
GA at the Entry to the Study | Main Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mirzakhani et al. 2016 [217] | PE risk | Vit D (SG) 408 CG 408 |
4400 daily 400 daily |
10–18th week | PE incidence SG 8.08% CG 8.33%, NS RR 0.97 95% CI: 0.61–1.53 |
Rostami et al. 2018 [256] | Vit D status screening |
Screened Vit D 800 Without Vit D 200 Non screened 900 |
50,000–300,000 weekly or monthly; 6–12 weeks |
<14th week | Screening reduces PE risk by 60% RR 0.40 95% CI: 0.30–0.60 |
Karamali et al. 2015 [257] | PE risk | Vit D (SG) 30 CG 30 patients with high PE risk |
50,000 every 2 weeks |
20–32nd week | PE incidence SG 3.3% CG 10% p = 0.3 |
Sablok et al. 2015 [228] | Pregnancy complication risk |
Vit D (SG) 120 CG 60 |
60,000–120,000 every 4 weeks | 20–32nd week | PE incidence SG 11.1% CG 21.1% p = 0.08 |
Ali et al. 2019 [258] |
PE risk | Vit D (SG) 83 CG 81 |
4000 daily | at 13th week up to 12th week after delivery |
PE incidence SG 1.2% CG 7.4% p = 0.049 |
PE—preeclampsia; Vit D—vitamin D; SG—study group; CG—control group; GA—gestational age; P—statistical significance; RR—relative risk; CI—confidence interval.