Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 7;13(11):3966. doi: 10.3390/nu13113966

Table 4.

Associations between dietary patterns and region, household structures and SES index in the study sample (adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals).

Variables “Traditional” DP “Prudent” DP “Adverse” DP
(Ref. Bottom Tertile) (Ref. Bottom Tertile) (Ref. Bottom Tertile)
Upper Tertile p Upper Tertile p Upper Tertile p
Region (ref. Świętokrzyskie) 0.88 (0.70–1.11) 0.2898 0.99 (0.78–1.25) 0.9062 1.03 (0.82–1.31) 0.7626
Household structure
Living with partner (ref. living alone) 0.74 (0.38–1.48) 0.4058 0.91 (0.46–1.83) 0.8014 1.68 (0.82–3.47) 0.1517
Living without a partner, but with my family (ref. living alone) 0.52 (0.22–1.26) 0.1413 1.58 (0.67–3.70) 0.0287 1.90 (0.78–4.69) 0.1515
Living with a partner and with my family (ref. living alone) 0.53 (0.25–1.11) 0.0883 2.02 (0.96–4.25) 0.0063 1.60 (0.74–3.46) 0.2268
SES index
Medium SES (ref. low SES) 0.92 (0.70–1.24) 0.6130 0.83 (0.62–1.12) 0.2113 1.05 (0.79–1.40) 0.7496
High SES (ref. low SES) 0.68 (0.51–0.92) 0.0125 0.44 (0.33–0.62) <0.0001 1.16 (0.86–1.57) 0.3314

p—significance level of the Wald’s test.