Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 10;10(11):2428. doi: 10.3390/plants10112428

Table 1.

Triterpenic acids in twelve Syzygium formosum trees. Some minor components that were close to the limits of quantification were excluded. For the comparison, two samples of Centella asiatica were analyzed by the same method.

S. formosum Triterpenic Acids a (mg/g Dry Weight) Total
Madecassic Acid Asiatic Acid Maslinic Acid Corosolic
Acid
Betulinic
Acid
Oleanolic
Acid
Ursolic
Acid
S1 0.20 ± 0.02 3.36 ± 0.51 0.26 ± 0.01 0.89 ± 0.15 4.74 ± 0.84 0.065 ± 0.005 0.18 ± 0.01 9.695 ± 1.545
S2 0.67 ± 0.01 5.26 ± 0.25 0.53 ± 0.02 1.59 ± 0.12 3.09 ± 0.02 0.10 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.01 11.44 ± 0.39
S3 0.50 ± 0.01 5.57 ± 0.17 0.41 ± 0.01 1.25 ± 0.06 4.54 ± 0.45 0.12 ± 0.01 0.28 ± 0.01 12.65 ± 0.68
S4 0.98 ± 0.04 12.6 ± 0.5 1.04 ± 0.05 3.54 ± 0.04 5.27 ± 0.36 0.33 ± 0.2 0.81 ± 0.04 24.56 ± 1.05
S5 0.37 ± 0.02 5.89 ± 0.02 0.98 ± 0.01 3.76 ± 0.12 3.89 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.01 0.66 ± 0.01 15.81 ± 0.18
S6 0.25 ± 0.04 2.78 ± 0.29 0.44 ± 0.04 1.64 ± 0.22 4.23 ± 0.43 0.065 ± 0.005 0.16 ± 0.01 9.56 ± 1.03
S7 0.24 ± 0.02 3.99 ± 0.05 0.37 ± 0.04 1.35 ± 0.07 2.53 ± 0.24 0.08 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.02 8.77 ± 0.43
S8 0.44 ± 0.03 4.68 ± 0.54 0.84 ± 0.06 3.78 ± 0.42 5.11 ± 0.50 0.18 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.05 15.53 ± 1.59
S9 0.29 ± 0.01 6.81 ± 0.46 0.95 ± 0.03 3.83 ± 0.30 3.07 ± 0.45 0.22 ± 0.02 0.66 ± 0.03 15.81 ± 1.18
S10 0.39 ± 0.03 4.51 ± 0.80 0.84 ± 0.05 4.02 ± 0.70 5.89 ± 0.78 0.19 ± 0.02 0.60 ± 0.03 16.41 ± 2.38
S11 0.27 ± 0.02 7.76 ± 0.61 0.86 ± 0.01 3.66 ± 0.47 2.70 ± 0.25 0.19 ± 0.02 0.56 ± 0.01 15.99 ± 1.35
S12 0.82 ± 0.01 10.07 ± 0.09 2.16 ± 0.02 6.21 ± 0.01 6.05 ± 0.22 0.53 ± 0.03 1.36 ± 0.02 27.19 ± 0.26
Average 0.42 ± 0.25 5.84 ± 2.81 0.79 ± 0.47 2.95 ± 1.50 4.24 ± 1.20 0.19 ± 0.12 0.51 ± 0.32 14.94 ± 5.50
C. asiatica 1.72 ± 0.26 3.21 ± 0.7 NA b NA NA NA NA 4.94 ± 0.96

a The order of chemicals follows retention times of triterpenic acids in HPLC-MS/MS analyses. b Not available: the chemical was not detected or under the limits of quantification.