Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12095. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212095

Table 4.

Clusters, number of members, and grouping variable scores.

Cluster N (% of
Sample)
Remote Work
Experiences
Organizational Size WFH Work Days Work in Team Having Children
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Cluster 1 34 (20.85%) 1.00 (0.00) 1.82 (0.93) 0.00 (0.00) 2.00 (0.00) 1.26 (0.44)
Cluster 2 21 (12.90%) 1.86 (0.79) 1.76 (0.94) 2.52 (2.33) 1.00 (0.00) 1.38 (0.50)
Cluster 3 34 (20.85%) 2.23 (0.43) 1.61 (0.49) 3.44 (1.52) 2.00 (0.00) 1.56 (0.50)
Cluster 4 34 (20.85%) 2.00 (0.00) 3.00 (0.00) 3.79 (1.47) 2.00 (0.00) 1.44 (0.50)
Cluster 5 40 (24.55%) 3.00 (0.00) 3.00 (0.00) 3.73 (1.72) 2.00 (0.00) 1.55 (0.50)
TOTAL 163 (100%) 2.07 (0.76) 2.31 (0.86) 2.75 (2.11) 1.87 (0.34) 1.45 (0.50)
F 159.72 ** 47.50 ** 37.00 * a 2.14
dF (Within; Between) (4; 158) (4; 158) (4; 158) - (4; 158)

Note. N = 163. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. a Impossible to compute because there was no within-group variance. Each group is homogeneous on this characteristic.