Table 4.
Cluster | N (% of Sample) |
Remote Work Experiences |
Organizational Size | WFH Work Days | Work in Team | Having Children |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
Cluster 1 | 34 (20.85%) | 1.00 (0.00) | 1.82 (0.93) | 0.00 (0.00) | 2.00 (0.00) | 1.26 (0.44) |
Cluster 2 | 21 (12.90%) | 1.86 (0.79) | 1.76 (0.94) | 2.52 (2.33) | 1.00 (0.00) | 1.38 (0.50) |
Cluster 3 | 34 (20.85%) | 2.23 (0.43) | 1.61 (0.49) | 3.44 (1.52) | 2.00 (0.00) | 1.56 (0.50) |
Cluster 4 | 34 (20.85%) | 2.00 (0.00) | 3.00 (0.00) | 3.79 (1.47) | 2.00 (0.00) | 1.44 (0.50) |
Cluster 5 | 40 (24.55%) | 3.00 (0.00) | 3.00 (0.00) | 3.73 (1.72) | 2.00 (0.00) | 1.55 (0.50) |
TOTAL | 163 (100%) | 2.07 (0.76) | 2.31 (0.86) | 2.75 (2.11) | 1.87 (0.34) | 1.45 (0.50) |
F | 159.72 ** | 47.50 ** | 37.00 * | a | 2.14 | |
dF (Within; Between) | (4; 158) | (4; 158) | (4; 158) | - | (4; 158) |
Note. N = 163. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. a Impossible to compute because there was no within-group variance. Each group is homogeneous on this characteristic.