Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 26;2021(11):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub3

Bonaventura 2007.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: RCT of a multi‐component intervention, the Intervention to Prevent Delirium (IPD) in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards
Date of study: 2005 to 2006
Power calculation: no
Inclusion criteria: age > or = to 65 years admitted to medical and geriatric wards in one hospital
Exclusion criteria: MMSE score < or =25, at least 1 relative not present, transfer out of ward, pre‐existing dementia, blindness, deafness, aphasia or unable to understand Italian
Participants Number in study: 60
Country: Italy
Setting: medical and geriatric wards
Age: not given
Sex M:F: Intervention 12/18, Control 12/18
Co‐morbidity: comparable P = 0.77
Dementia: excluded
Frailty: not reported
Interventions Intervention: Intervention to Prevent Delirium (IPD), a series of structured and standardised welfare actions based on existing guidelines, including support in the following areas: cognitive re‐orientation, sensory and environmental, mobilisation, hydration, and 'socio‐emotional'
Control: usual care, not described further
Outcomes Outcomes reported:
‐ Incident delirium measured using CAM & DRS‐R‐98
‐ Functional performance using Barthel Index
Outcomes not reported: none
Frequency of outcomes assessment: days 1, 2, 4 and 7 of admission
Notes Funding source: not reported
Declarations of interest: not reported
Delirium not excluded at enrolment
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Sequence generated using day of admission
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Odd and even days of admission used so concealment unlikely
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants and personnel not blinded, not possible given nature of the intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Outcome assessment blinding not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All randomised participants included in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information presented to make judgment
Other bias Low risk No evidence of other bias