Table 4.
TMS responses to conditioning TSCS pulses.
| Group | TSCS Intensity (% RMT) | Synapse Delay | Compared to TMS Alone (%) | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB | 50% | −25 | 0.2% | 9.4 |
| −10 | 15.4% | 16.7 | ||
| −2 | 0.6% | 8.9 | ||
| 0 | −11.4% | 8.9 | ||
| 2 | −0.5% | 7.1 | ||
| 5 | 8.1% | 16.2 | ||
| 10 | 8.7% | 9.1 | ||
| n/a | −98.9% | 0.6 | ||
| 70% | −25 | −2.7% | 4.8 | |
| −10 | 2.9% | 11.0 | ||
| −2 | 0.7% | 6.3 | ||
| 0 | 4.4% | 7.8 | ||
| 2 | 12.6% | 11.2 | ||
| 5 | 9.4% | 12.2 | ||
| 10 | 20.4% | 19.6 | ||
| n/a | −97.4% | 1.1 | ||
| 90% | −25 | −1.8% | 13.3 | |
| −10 | 4.7% | 9.6 | ||
| −2 | 10.6% | 10.5 | ||
| 0 | 15.5% | 13.9 | ||
| 2 | 6.1% | 8.9 | ||
| 5 | 3.1% | 9.8 | ||
| 10 | 3.7% | 6.6 | ||
| n/a | −93.1% | 1.9 | ||
| n/a | n/a | 0.0% | 0.0 | |
| SCI | 50% | −25 | 2.5% | 6.4 |
| −10 | 4.7% | 8.7 | ||
| −2 | −1.1% | 6.4 | ||
| 0 | −4.5% | 4.4 | ||
| 2 | 13.3% | 12.9 | ||
| 5 | −9.1% | 6.1 | ||
| 10 | 0.6% | 4.7 | ||
| n/a | −94.5% | 2.1 | ||
| 70% | −25 | −10.1% | 6.6 | |
| −10 | 1.5% | 7.3 | ||
| −2 | −2.9% | 6.5 | ||
| 0 | 5.8% | 5.4 | ||
| 2 | 7.6% | 12.8 | ||
| 5 | 9.6% | 8.1 | ||
| 10 | 17.8% | 8.2 | ||
| n/a | −92.0% | 3.1 | ||
| 90% | −25 | −15.3% | 4.5 | |
| −10 | 12.1% | 9.0 | ||
| −2 | 16.2% | 21.8 | ||
| 0 | 5.1% | 7.6 | ||
| 2 | 32.0% | 27.8 | ||
| 5 | 36.4% | 24.3 | ||
| 10 | 28.8% | 21.9 | ||
| n/a | −88.2% | 3.1 | ||
| n/a | n/a | 0.0% | 0.0 |
TSCS: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; RMT: Resting motor threshold; n/a: not applicable.