Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 9;10(11):2734. doi: 10.3390/foods10112734

Table 3.

Antimicrobial activity of R. officinalis EO from Serbia (SRB) and Russia (RF) (mean value diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) including disc (6 mm)) ± standard deviation).

Group Tested Strains Disk Diffusion Method
(15 µL of EO Concentration 100%)
Positive Control Negative Control
Tested Samples of EO Antibiotic/Antimicotic DMSO
5%
SRB RF CHL TET Actidion
G(-) bacteria E.coli
ATCC 25922
32 ± 3 b 40.0 ± 0.0 a 29 ± 2 b 21.0 ± 0.0 c - nd *
P. aeruginosa
ATCC 27853
10.0 ± 0.0 c 21 ± 3 a 12.3 ± 0.6 bc 14.7 ± 0.6 b - nd
G(+) bacteria B. cereus
ATCC 11778
12 ± 1 d 40.0 ± 0.0 a 30.3 ± 0.6 b 28 ± 1 c - nd
S. aureus
ATCC 25923
32 ± 2 b 40.0 ± 0.0 a 29.7 ± 0.6 b 26.0 ± 0.0 c - nd
Yeast S. cerevisiae
ATCC 9763
33 ± 2 b 40.0 ± 0.0 a - - 40.0 ± 0.0 a nd
Fungi A. brasiliensis
ATCC 16404
11 ± 2 c 33.0 ± 0.0 a - - 26.3 ± 0.6 b nd

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3), different lowercase superscript within the same row indicate a significant difference of means according to Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test (p < 0.05). CHL-chloramphenicol, TET-tetracycline, DMSO-dimethyl sulfoxide. * nd—not detected.