Table 3.
First
Author and Year |
Sample Size
(M/F) |
Participant
Characteristics |
Stand Density
(Trees/ha) |
DBH
(cm) |
Canopy Density |
Forest
Characteristics |
Environmental
Characteristics |
Outcome
Measurement |
Activity Type | Time of Measure |
Study
Design |
|||||
An 2019 [84] |
13 (7/6) |
Healthy university students Age: 21.8 ± 1.9 |
3 different forest sites (no control assigned) |
Location: 4351′ N, 12518′ E |
Temp: 18 °C (10–25 °C) Relative humidity: 45% Wind speed: 3.33 m/s |
SBP; DBP; HR | Staying (30 min) |
Sep, 2017 (8:30–12:00) |
Randomized Cross-over | |||||||
1667/ha | 13.26 | 0.56 | Betula platyphylla | Illuminance: 4617 lx | SBP(/); DBP(/); HR(/) | |||||||||||
1867/ha | 10.35 | 0.75 | Acer triflorum | Illuminance: 1124 lx | SBP(/); DBP(/); HR(+) | |||||||||||
1993/ha | 14.39 | 0.78 | Quercus mongolica | Illuminance: 1012 lx | SBP(+/); DBP(+/); HR(+/) | |||||||||||
Bach 2021 [85] |
10 (6/4) |
Healthy university students with no abnormalities in the respiratory or immune system Age: 36.4 ± 6.5 |
One forest site and urban site (control) |
Location: N, 2 E Altitude: 860–972 m Dominant species: Quercus ilex |
Temp: 23.87 ± 0.18 °C Relative humidity: 53.7% |
Blood concentration of Alpha-pinene(/); Beta-pinene(/); Alpha-phellandrene(/); Limonene(/); All monoterpene(/) | Walking (120 min) |
July, 2018 (10:00–12:00) |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
|||||||
10500/ha | 6.43 | 0.95 | ||||||||||||||
Bielinis 2019 [27] |
21 (12/9) |
Healthy university students and non-student volunteers with no mental or physical diseases or metabolic syndromes Age: 23.9 ± 2.7 |
One forest group (no control) |
Location: N, 20 E Dominant species: Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris |
Temp: 25 °C Relative humidity: 46% Wind speed: 6.11 m/s Noise: 38.08 ± 5.19 dB Illuminance: 37755.24 lx |
SBP(+); DBP(/); PR(+); MAP(+); POMS(Confusion(+) Fatigue(+/) Anger(+) Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Vigor(/)); PANAS(PA(/) NA(+)); ROS(+); SVS(+) |
Staying (60 min) |
May, 2018 (15:45–16:15) |
Uncontrolled Before and After | |||||||
1200/ha | NA | NA | ||||||||||||||
Elsadek 2019 [86] |
346 (200/164) |
Healthy university students with no mental or physical diseases Age: 23.0 ± 4.6 |
3 different forest sites and urban site(control) |
Location: N, E |
POMS; STAI; ROS; SVS; PET | Walking (15 min) |
May, 2018 (10:00–15:30) |
Randomized Crossover |
||||||||
NA | NA | 0.13 | Urban road (control) |
Temp: 31.8 °C Relative humidity: 42.8% Wind speed: 0.66 m/s |
POMS(Anxiety(−) Depression(−) Anger(−) Fatigue(−) Confusion(−) Vigor(−)); STAI(−); ROS(−); SVS(−) | |||||||||||
0.49 | Prunus serrulata | Temp: 31.2 °C Relative humidity: 47.0% Wind speed: 0.23 m/s |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)); STAI(+); ROS(+); SVS(+) | |||||||||||||
0.89 | Plantanus hispanica | Temp: 29.0 °C Relative humidity: 50.9% Wind speed: 0.15m/s |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)); STAI(+); ROS(+); SVS(+) | |||||||||||||
0.94 | Metasequoia glyptroboides | Temp: 28.1 °C Relative humidity: 52.9% Wind speed: 0.11 m/s |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)); STAI(+); ROS(+); SVS(+) | |||||||||||||
Lee 2020 [87] |
16 (5/11) |
Housewives, freelancers and office workers Age: 41.6 ± 1.8 |
One forest site and one outdoor site(control) |
Location: N, 128 E Dominant species: Pinus rigida and Quercus aliena |
NA | DEP(+/); ANX(+/); AGG(/); ST-IN-S(+); ST-V-RG-P(+) | Staying (120 min) |
May–Aug, 2017 | Controlled Before and After | |||||||
156/ha | 27.4 | NA | ||||||||||||||
Oishi 2003 [88] |
44 (23/21) |
Healthy residents including students and workers Age: 24.4 ± 9.9 |
5 different forest sites and one site outside the forest(control) | Location: 39 N, E |
POMS | Staying (10 min) |
Jul–Sep, 2001 (8:45–13:10) |
Non-Randomized Cross-over | ||||||||
250/ha | 23 | NA | Pinus densiflora | Temp: 19.67 ± 3.31 °C Relative humidity: 68.9% |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)) | |||||||||||
750/ha | 34.9 | Cyptomeria japonica | Temp: 20.29 ± 3.66 °C Relative humidity: 69.3% |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)) | ||||||||||||
1700/ha | 10.6 | Quercus serrata | Temp: 19.91 ± 3.40 °C Relative humidity: 75.8% |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)) | ||||||||||||
2275/ha | 10.4 |
Pinus densiflora
Machilus thunbergii |
Temp: 20.17 ± 3.19 °C Relative humidity: 73.3% |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)) | ||||||||||||
2875/ha | 9.5 |
Pinus densiflora
Quercus serrata |
Temp: 18.63 ± 3.16 °C Relative humidity: 76.4% |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)) | ||||||||||||
Saito 2019 [89] |
17 (17/-) |
healthy male volunteer had no history of cardiovascular disease or mental illness Age: 40.2 ± 6.2 |
2 different forest sites: managed forest and unmanaged forest(control) |
Location: N, 138 E |
Wind speed: m/s | SBP; DBP; MAP; HR; HF; LF/HF; saliva cortisol | Staying (15 min) |
July, 2014 | Randomized Crossover | |||||||
1024/ha | 19.78 | 0.62 | Mixed forest (Broadleaf trees: 82% Coniferous trees: 18%) |
Temp: 24.3 ± 2.8 °C Relative humidity: 73.3% Illuminance: 255.0 ± 97.6 lx |
SBP(+); DBP(+); MAP(+); HR(/); HF(+/); LF/HF(+); saliva cortisol(+) | |||||||||||
1208/ha | 15.75 | 0.91 | Mixed forest (Broadleaf trees: 50% Coniferous trees: 50%) |
Temp: 24.2 ± 2.8 °C Relative humidity: 70.0% Illuminance: 119.2 ± 48.5 lx |
SBP(+); DBP(+); MAP(+); HR; HF(−/); LF/HF(−); saliva cortisol(+/) | |||||||||||
Simkin 2020 [90] |
66 (41/59) |
City workers aged from 26–65 Age: 43.4 ± 10.7 |
4 different forest sites (no control assigned) |
Picea abies-dominated forests in Finland | ROS; SVS; PANAS | Staying (15 min) and Walking (45 min) |
Aug–Oct, 2016 April–June, 2017 (15:00–17:00) |
Randomized Crossover | ||||||||
374/ha | 35 | NA | Location: N, 25 E (stand age > 120) |
Temp: 12.8 ± 4.4 °C Relative humidity: 39–96% |
ROS(+); SVS(+); PANAS(+) | |||||||||||
424/ha | 30 | Location: N, 24 E (stand age: 95) |
Temp: 15.8 ± 4.2 °C Relative humidity: 29–100% |
ROS(+); SVS(+); PANAS(+) | ||||||||||||
520/ha | 28 | Location: N, 25 E (stand age: 100) |
Temp: 15.9 ± 5.8 °C Relative humidity: 39–91% |
ROS(+); SVS(+); PANAS(+) | ||||||||||||
1746/ha | 16 | Location: N, 25 E (stand age: 40) |
Temp: 15.3 ± 4.8 °C Relative humidity: 27–98% |
ROS(+); SVS(+); PANAS(+) | ||||||||||||
Takayama 2017a [91] |
18 (18/-) |
Healthy male volunteer without history of cardiovascular disease or mental illness Age: 40.2 ± 6.4 |
2 different forest sites: managed forest and unmanaged forest(control) |
Location: N, 13886′ E |
POMS; PANAS; ROS; PRS | Staying (15 min) |
July, 2014 | Randomized Crossover | ||||||||
1056/ha | 23.12 | 0.62 |
Larix kaempferi 66%, Cornus controversa 10% Pinus densiflora 7% |
Temp: 24.3 ± 7.9 °C Relative humidity: 73 ± 39% Wind velocity: /s Radiant Heat: 25.5 ± 10.5 °C Illuminance: 255.0 ± 97.6 lx Noise: 41.5 ± 3.8 dB |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(/) Anger(/) Fatigue(+/) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)); PANAS(PA(/)NA(+)); ROS(+) | |||||||||||
1212/ha | 18.54 | 0.91 |
Larix kaempferi 66% Cornus controversa 7% Pinus densiflora 7% |
Temp: 24.2 ± 7.6 °C Relative humidity: 70 ± 34% Wind velocity: m/s Radiant Heat: 25.3 ± 9.8 °C Illuminance: 119.2 ± 48.5 lx Noise: 39.0 ± 3.9 dB |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(/) Anger(/) Fatigue(/) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)); PANAS(PA(/)NA(+/)) ROS(/) | |||||||||||
Takayama 2017 [92] |
15 (11/4) |
University students and mid-aged faculties without had no history of cardiovascular disease or mental illness Age: 35.9 ± 8.2 |
2 different forest sites: thinned forest and unthinned forest(control) |
Location: 35°41′ N, 138°86′ E | POMS; PANAS; ROS; PRS | Staying (15 min) |
Oct, May, 2013 |
Randomized Crossover | ||||||||
1056/ha | 23.12 | 0.52 |
Larix kaempferi 66%, Cornus controversa 10% Pinus densiflora 7% |
Temp: 18.6 ± 0.92 °C Relative humidity: 92% Wind velocity: m/s Radiant Heat: 18.8 °C Illuminance: 336172 lx |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+/) Confusion(+) Vigor(/)); PANAS(PA(/)NA(/)) ROS(+/) | |||||||||||
1200/ha | 22.76 | 0.59 |
Larix kaempferi 66%, Cornus controversa 10% Pinus densiflora 7% |
Temp: 17.1.52 °C Relative humidity: 38% Wind velocity: m/s Radiant Heat: 21.8 °C Illuminance: 668 lx |
POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(/) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(/)); PANAS(PA(/)NA(/)) ROS(+) | |||||||||||
Yu [93] |
123 (43/85) |
Middle-aged and elderly subjects aged 45 to 86 years No disease (n = 69), hypertension (n = 25), diabetes (n = 9), heart disease (n = 8) Age: 60.0 ± 7.4 |
One forest site (no control) |
Location: N, 121 E Dominant species: Cryptomeria japonica |
Temp: 22.6 °C Relative humidity: 87.4% Wind speed: 0.1 m/s |
PR(+); SBP(+); DBP(+); HF(/); LF/HF(/); POMS(Anxiety(+) Depression(+) Anger(+) Fatigue(+) Confusion(+) Vigor(+)); STAI(+) | Walking (180 min) |
July, 2016 (8:30–12:00) |
Uncontrolled Before and After | |||||||
1200/ha | NA | NA | ||||||||||||||
Zhou 2019 [94] |
43 (8/35) |
University students free from diagnosed cardiovascular, allergic, physical disease, or mental diseases Age: 20.8 ± 0.9 |
2 different forest sites (no control assigned) |
Location: N– N 106 E–107 E |
Temp: 22.6 °C Relative humidity: 87.4% Wind speed: 0.1 m/s |
Anti-anxiety scores | walking (60 min) | Dec, 2016 | Randomized Cross-over | |||||||
NA | NA | 0.20–0.75 |
Cinnamomum camphora
Quercus fabri Platanus acerifolia |
Anti-anxiety scores (financial states(+); exam pressure(+); campus life(/); love affair relationship(+)) | ||||||||||||
0.50–0.75 |
Cinnamomum camphora
Celtis sinensis Catalpa bungei Celtis sinensis |
Anti-anxiety scores(financial states(+); exam pressure(+); campus life(+); love affair relationship(/)) |
AGG 7—questions on aggression, ANX 11—questions on anxiety, DBP—diastolic blood pressure, DEP 11—questions on depression, HBP—high-frequency, HR—heart rate, LF/HF—ratio of low-frequency and high frequency, MAP—mean arterial pressure, PANAS—positive and negative affect schedule, POMS—profile of mood states, PR—pulse rate, PRS—perceived restorativeness scale, ROS—restorative outcomes scale, SBP—systolic blood pressure, STAI—state trait anxiety inventory, ST-V-IN-S—five questions on stress vulnerability-interpersonal sensitivity, ST-V-RG-P—five questions on stress vulnerability-self-regulation problems, SVS—subjective vitality scale, Temp—temperature. +: significant effect on positive health outcome; +/: including both significant and nonsignificant effect on positive health outcome; /: nonsignificant effect; -/: including both significant and nonsignificant effect on negative health outcome -: significant effect on negative outcome.