Table 2.

JBI for cross-sectional studies: diagnosis, data analysis, response rate.

Studies	Was the Data Analysis Conducted with Sufficient Coverage of the Identified Sample?	Were Valid Methods Used for the Identification of the Condition?	Was the Condition Measured in a Standard, Reliable Way for all Participants?	Was There Appropriate Statistical Analysis?	Was the Response Rate Adequate, and If Not, Was the Low Response Rate Managed Appropriately?
Aarabi et al. [34]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Agudelo-Suárez et al. 2019 [35]	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES
Al-Haboubi et al. [36]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Aarora et al. 2019 [37]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Delgado-Angulo et al. 2018 [38]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Dujister et al. 2014 [39]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Erdsiek et al. 2011 [40]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Ferrazzano et al. 2019 [41]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Gatou et al. 2011 [42]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Goetz et al. 2018 [43]	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES
Høyvik et al. 2019 [44]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Jacobsson et al. 2011 [45]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Marcenes et al. 2013 [46]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Mattila et al. 2016 [47]	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO
Mustafa et al. 2020 [48]	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO
Portero de la Cruz et al. 2020 [49]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Riatto et al. 2018 [50]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Rouxel et al. 2017 [51]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Solyman et al. 2018 [52]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Van der Tas et al. 2017 [53]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Van Meljeen-van Lunteren et al. 2019 [54]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO
Wigen et al. 2010 [55]	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO