Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 20;9(11):315. doi: 10.3390/toxics9110315

Table 2.

Model performance (Factor of Agreement, FoA) of the IV-MBM EQP v2.0 using Tanneberger et al. [38] dataset under various assumptions regarding the effective volume of headspace (HS multiplier) and sorption to plastic (spLFER).

IV-MBM EQP v2.0 Model Assumptions FoA
10MB
FoA
10MAE
r2
“Non-volatiles only” (log KAW or log DAW < −4.0)
Fischer et al. plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 1
0.84 1.27 0.81
Kramer plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 1
0.96 1.21 0.83
All Chemicals
Fischer et al. plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 1
1.33 1.89 0.54
Fischer et al. plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 10
1.17 1.67 0.71
Fischer et al. plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 50
0.98 1.59 0.82
Fischer et al. plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 100
0.88 1.65 0.86
All Chemicals
Kramer plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 1
1.58 2.03 0.41
Kramer plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 10
1.37 1.77 0.63
Kramer plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 50
1.11 1.64 0.81
Kramer plastic spLFER
HS Multiplier = 100
0.99 1.69 0.86

HS = Headspace, MB = Model bias (Equation (12)), MAE = Mean Absolute Error (Equation (13)).